From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: Win64 testers? Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:48:41 +0000 Message-ID: <87jzg773ka.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <87bk1k8mzd.fsf@protonmail.com> <861q2gs8xu.fsf@gnu.org> <877cc88j4p.fsf@protonmail.com> <86seuvre6x.fsf@gnu.org> <8734mv8yb6.fsf@protonmail.com> <8634mvqte0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15037"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , sebastian@sebasmonia.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, yantar92@posteo.net To: Quang Kien Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 23 16:19:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1shV8s-0003dN-AD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:19:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shV7q-0003f5-AA; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:18:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shUen-0006XG-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.133]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shUem-0006gi-6a; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:48:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1724420926; x=1724680126; bh=AELLv/TknoJ4LLQ1Ka/JGNgys8PTljIQvJcDZOr7DhI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=TeE/84UOCDaHgUzd81/GDrz7N6mkrwIRz+ZmdqpjtQzOg49Kgh/3dXZo+N0LM9SeL Crbv73f+xvBgetsVvV3dTp225p6VlHSHs/uwmISclULyYRrCVfPNWAx9SbvYC0aC7V 9tjHk+CqRceXPwbY85xMndXoBscvy0ZiSkdur45R9DgBUv7CF3W+I6uo8z5tnMveMZ 39N+e73ThLCyCBUmBVszBBkWw5SP2Mi8XAmzuflGCCOn8IPzO5v87MDHztfGyIFrNc dwl/QyS9+xiQELHW8U/gpclgXq2lwNZ0oACkgAgf5mJgNl1fLDxuX5Uh2pIKd1pt0d zWtqQdXvm1O4Q== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: dd0459c9d14033de9b04302616cd3b2b2c14f09c Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.133; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40133.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:18:49 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323087 Archived-At: "Quang Kien Nguyen" writes: > I've built a new version with debug info here[1]. Thank you, I've just tested that in winedbg --gdb and it produces very usable backtraces! > And here is the backtrace in gdb on crash > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007ffbdf732b83 in KERNELBASE!DebugBreak () from > C:\WINDOWS\System32\KernelBase.dll > #1 0x00007ff684e0fc2a in emacs_abort () at > D:/a/emacs-build/emacs-build/git/a28ba6c/src/w32fns.c:11369 > #2 0x00007ff684cbe687 in terminate_due_to_signal (sig=3D11, > backtrace_limit=3D40) at > D:/a/emacs-build/emacs-build/git/a28ba6c/src/emacs.c:470 > #3 0x00007ff684cdd959 in deliver_fatal_thread_signal.lto_priv.0 > (sig=3D11) at D:/a/emacs-build/emacs-build/git/a28ba6c/src/sysdep.c:1800 > #4 0x00007ff684f015e2 in _gnu_exception_handler > (exception_data=3D0xc1833fc980) at > C:/M/B/src/mingw-w64/mingw-w64-crt/crt/crt_handler.c:213 > #5 0x00007ffbdfa71acf in ucrtbase!__C_specific_handler () from > C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll > #6 0x00007ffbe22e353f in ntdll!.chkstk () from C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll= .dll > #7 0x00007ffbe219f358 in ntdll!RtlWow64GetCurrentCpuArea () from > C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll > #8 0x00007ffbe22e2e7e in ntdll!KiUserExceptionDispatcher () from > C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll > #9 0x00007ffb429c1740 in ?? () > #10 0x00007ff684e33126 in emacs_gnutls_pull (p=3D0x22600d1c170, > buf=3D, sz=3D) at > D:/a/emacs-build/emacs-build/git/a28ba6c/src/gnutls.c:741 > #11 emacs_gnutls_pull (p=3D0x22600d1c170, buf=3D, > sz=3D) at > D:/a/emacs-build/emacs-build/git/a28ba6c/src/w32.c:11214 > #12 0x00007ffb4297d64c in ?? () > #13 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () How hard is it for Microsoft Windows users to navigate up to #10 and print the value of (struct Lisp_Process *)p? Do those gdb commands "just work" in gdb.exe? Here I get obviously corrupt data, which indicates to me that the bug is likely to be as I've described. Pip