From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New "make benchmark" target Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 10:18:02 +0000 Message-ID: <87jzb9d0q3.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <87h679kftn.fsf@protonmail.com> <87wmfhxjce.fsf@protonmail.com> <86jzbhnmzg.fsf@gnu.org> <87o70txew4.fsf@protonmail.com> <871pxorh30.fsf@protonmail.com> <86wmfgm3a5.fsf@gnu.org> <87pll2fsj7.fsf@protonmail.com> <86r05ibfaa.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Pip Cet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16047"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acorallo@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, mattiase@acm.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 05 12:16:45 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tUOcf-00043w-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 12:16:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUOcR-0007p3-V8; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 06:16:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUNi1-0007oy-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 05:18:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-10629.protonmail.ch ([79.135.106.29]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUNhy-00023c-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 05:18:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1736072287; x=1736331487; bh=X0tzUtA12qONnVNfQ1fDkt4/ReMlp5uXyUlGYVBGxfc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=wHRgNVGJGHx0GLuiFdpscyyEgoM07qyVtXVh5WRgkkNE2qnlOJ40fALq/YVhCNwGH /Izw/5zfF9jJKdZkcKd3Yd1HM+qGSasnA5EONJqe4xIzYVVtWZCjTH2dzcqKOkxN65 9SWtuUenu64RR3G/Rjrihd60SB93xq1CBUVMffD8o47UBlJhjI+Uei96MBYrUcwg4t Gx0OHdWM5uhU1pGCZwZign14LrWLHDdOaeeUrZE/rJiquVMtup+3IzQOBGvHlX6YVJ +fxzsNU9FKtEd04ppOdJBtXbbf4mrkCUTp+dsZJg0jU6EOlonoJGPf3GOVKbUrEpVl eYcS0AgHxhh0A== In-Reply-To: <86r05ibfaa.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 02ba8c3031ea5e2f4c2c78c627962577521de092 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=79.135.106.29; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-10629.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 06:16:19 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327717 Archived-At: "Eli Zaretskii" writes: >> I'm happy to change the scratch/elisp-benchmarks branch in the ways >> we've discussed, and it should be merged, but if someone decides to >> incrementally solve some of the issues, that, while not very harmful, >> would be an inefficient use of resources. > > Let's hear what Andrea thinks about the issues you reported (let's > please discuss them on the bug tracker, not here), and let's take it > from there. Sure, just let me know when we can merge the branch (assuming you meant to say that the merge, too, should wait for Andrea's thoughts) or which other changes are required! Pip