From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: strange emacs 21.4 on ftp.gnu.org:/pub/gnu/emacs Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:25:39 -0500 Message-ID: <87is54l1u4.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <73766b120502070245671f77ee@mail.gmail.com> <87brawmmzp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87oeewl61w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107797254 23001 80.91.229.6 (7 Feb 2005 17:27:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juan LEON Lahoz Garcia , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 18:27:27 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyCfW-0006H9-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:27:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyCth-0007Mv-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyCsF-0006XP-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:40:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyCsC-0006WR-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:40:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyCsC-0006Vu-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:40:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.74] (helo=tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyCdo-0006Cw-79; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:25:40 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([65.92.240.235]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050207172539.TBZT2034.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 23C5ED7343; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:25:39 -0500 (EST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:40:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33027 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33027 >>> It would not appear, however, that either of our opinions would have >>> any relevance, anyway, so we might just stop musing about such things. >> [...] >>> I propose that we now, where another renaming of everything has >>> seemingly become necessary, decide to call the next major release >> >> Your first two lines above should make it clear to you that the >> second two lines would be a waste of time. Just to make it clear, I'm referring to the "decide" part when I talk about a waste of time. Stefan