From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TTY Vertical divider face? Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:03:29 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87is0q9s4i.fsf@jurta.org> References: <878y1nobtb.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118157114 851 80.91.229.2 (7 Jun 2005 15:11:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: len@reeltwo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 07 17:11:49 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DffgK-0000nO-UB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:07:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dffmf-0002HC-9P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:14:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfflg-00021b-Gg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:13:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfflc-00020n-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfflb-0001z9-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:13:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DffjB-00044p-22; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-42-112-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.42.112]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26898566E; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:07:19 +0300 (EEST) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:12:08 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38263 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38263 > It's easy just using the same method Len used in lisp. Any objection > to the following patch? > > Should it use a different face I think yes. I'd personally set its both background and foreground colors to "white" to display the vertical border as a solid 1-character-wide white line. > (note that the actual face that ends up being used by this code is > `mode-line-inactive', even though the code says MODE_LINE_FACE_ID; > I'm not sure why this is)? I tried your patch, but instead of either `mode-line' or `mode-line-inactive' it displays the vertical border in the `fringe' face. But maybe this is good. We can reuse `fringe' face for the vertical border because fringes are not available on text-only terminals. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/