From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:29:19 -0600 Message-ID: <87irujq3ls.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> References: <85acg5u9nl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lkzo1s34.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87r79fuf4z.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87u0e7i3us.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87fyppi8cl.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87mzjxdk66.fsf@jurta.org> <85iruk4qnf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87br0co9ym.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87zmnwmhlv.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> Reply-To: belanger@truman.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132728920 30188 80.91.229.2 (23 Nov 2005 06:55:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: belanger@truman.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 07:54:55 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeo8O-0002LB-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:29:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeo8N-0003r5-KV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:29:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeo8B-0003pY-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:29:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeo89-0003nS-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:29:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeo89-0003nF-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:29:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [24.116.0.227] (helo=S1.cableone.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eeo89-0002e9-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:29:21 -0500 Original-Received: from vh213602.truman.edu.truman.edu (unverified [24.117.225.205]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 38059089 for multiple; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:29:43 -0700 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:14:59 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 2, First 92, in=26, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.117.225.205 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46469 Archived-At: "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > For C-x , = `!', `%', `&', `*', `_', `~', > `|', `\', `"', `:' or `,' might work, and some of them might be > accessible without the shift key on most keyboards. But without the > extra control key, I'm not sure they're "out of the way" enough to get > the green light. > > One of those might be ok. Perhaps any of them is ok. > I see no particular reason to oppose the use of any of them. Okay, great. It looks like the only symbol listed above that is consistently available without a modifier key (to avoid having to change the modifier keys while typing the key sequence in) is the comma. Before I formally request the keybinding, are there any objections to using `C-x,' for `calc-dispatch'? Jay