From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TAB in Eval: prompt in minibuffer? Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:57:17 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87iru3c92y.fsf@jurta.org> References: <4394DED5.2070500@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133832842 29186 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 01:34:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 01:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 02:33:55 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjRhi-0001dL-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:33:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjRhs-0005Xz-5t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:33:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjRhD-0005LE-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:32:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjRh9-0005Jf-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjRh9-0005Ja-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:32:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjRhj-0005f8-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-34-231-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.34.231]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD8F1EAA; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 03:32:44 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-Reply-To: <4394DED5.2070500@student.lu.se> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:44:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47025 Archived-At: > Is there any reason not to bind TAB to `lisp-complete-symbol' for the > "Eval:" prompt in minibuffer? It is bound to > indent-for-tab-command' now. TAB in the minibuffer normally is used to complete the whole contents of the minibuffer, but the "Eval:" minibuffer can contain arbitrary expressions. What you want is already available via M-TAB in the minibuffer. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/