Re: latexenc and `TeX-master'

["Arne Jørgensen" <arne@arnested.dk>]

David Reitter <david.reitter@gmail.com> writes:

> On 22 Jan 2006, at 17:21, Arne Jørgensen wrote:
>
>> Arne Jørgensen <arne@arnested.dk> writes:
>>
>>> But it is probably better to check if the file is a regular and then
>>> also check if it is actually readable.
>>
>> Readability is already checked later in the code. Checking whether the
>> file is a regular file is also better checked at that point.
>
> yes, I agree. The second change (below) should catch all other cases.
>
>
> *** latexenc.el	02 Dec 2005 13:24:11 +0000	1.11
> --- latexenc.el	22 Jan 2006 08:52:12 +0000	
> ***************
> *** 174,180 ****
>                           (find-file-noselect latexenc-main-file t)))
>                     (coding-system-base   ;Disregard the EOL part of
> the CS.
>                      (with-current-buffer latexenc-main-buffer
> !                      (or coding-system-for-write buffer-file-coding- 
> system))))
>                 'undecided))))
>       'undecided))
>
> --- 175,183 ----
>                           (find-file-noselect latexenc-main-file t)))
>                     (coding-system-base   ;Disregard the EOL part of
> the CS.
>                      (with-current-buffer latexenc-main-buffer
> !                      (or coding-system-for-write
> ! 			 buffer-file-coding-system
> ! 			 'undecided))))
>                 'undecided))))
>       'undecided))

On a first read I just thought this fix was a reindentation of the
code, but now that I've read it more carefully I think it should be
applied :-)

Kind regards

     /arne
-- 
Arne Jørgensen <http://arnested.dk/>