From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS commits and logs Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:44:23 +0900 Message-ID: <87irhqho6w.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87r6wh1o5h.fsf@olgas.newt.com> <87bqnk74d1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162939519 23818 80.91.229.2 (7 Nov 2006 22:45:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 07 23:45:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhZgV-0005yB-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:44:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhZgV-00014K-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GhZgJ-000128-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GhZgG-0000xa-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:44:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhZgG-0000xN-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [203.216.5.72] (helo=smtp02.dentaku.gol.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GhZgD-0001Ry-ID; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:44:29 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-101-127.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.101.127] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1GhZgA-0006Kn-3T; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:44:26 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 84EFD2F43; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:44:24 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue\, 07 Nov 2006 11\:47\:39 -0500") Original-Lines: 21 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61933 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > Is this all a matter of Gnus? We could handle Gnus specially. > > Primarily Gnus, yes. > > Could you explain why you do this in cases that are not in Gnus? I do this when I do merging. Except for the Gnus 5.10 -> Emacs trunk case, this merging doesn't occur to the trunk, but on branches (in many of those cases I don't include changelog entries in the commit log anyway, because it would make the commit log entries absurdly huge). If you mostly care about the trunk, then it's safe to say that Gnus is the only current case where I merge regularly to the trunk (you never know what the future holds of course). -Miles -- P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false, for reasons of military security.