From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [werner@suse.de: Several problems in KDE/KWin] Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 13:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87ir39id12.fsf@escher.local.home> References: <87k5nqqtfv.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87r6hyjbgw.fsf@escher.local.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197117329 29066 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2007 12:35:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:35:29 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 13:35:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0yu7-0008I5-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 13:35:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0ytq-00053h-LK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:35:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0ytm-00051k-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0ytk-00050G-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0ytk-00050D-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0ytk-0001Fd-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0yta-0003Or-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: from i5387de9c.versanet.de ([83.135.222.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: from Stephen.Berman by i5387de9c.versanet.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:35:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: i5387de9c.versanet.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84872 Archived-At: On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:41:44 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:08:00 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: >> >>> If you try to maximize a second time the frame is actually truely >>> maximized. >> >> This is so if you maximize either vertically (mouse-2) or horizontally >> (mouse-3) but not for both dimensions simultaneously (mouse-1). > > I don't see any difference between these three operations. Interesting. I see what I wrote with emacs -Q on GNU Emacs 23.0.50.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2007-11-29 running in KDE 3.5.8-2.2 under openSUSE 10.3. In particular, if I click the maximize button in the frame with mouse-1 a second time, the frame expands to true maximum for a fraction of a second but then snaps back to the previous not quite maximum size. With mouse-2 or mouse-3, in contrast, clicking maximize a second time or more toggles between true and not quite maximum. What KDE and OS are you using? Steve Berman