From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc for call-process, ARGS is missing Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:04:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87iqzu2ez1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <47D5E3AC.1040707@gmail.com> <87zlt6xc9e.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47D5E749.8040101@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205201140 31156 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2008 02:05:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Emacs Devel To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 03:06:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYtrj-0000vY-Ap for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:05:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtrA-0004rT-91 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtr6-0004r2-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtr4-0004qd-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtr4-0004qZ-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYtr3-0004pW-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:38 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2637428fga.30 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:04:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=f/5KmPdVFtwRzQ/IgYwjIkLIH0hZAklTUknpbe4Dr2U=; b=TfQe6LMa+5nIxVHGH47CEMOe5tifh0oon7pRnitgEsE3b9HqxowL4dfRTKfckIkLnGc9MSk/V9mVPbNjTkyNF7z2qHNqaecO7Pw8Peev/DP+k+IKUqLR0OPI3WGIAu1FYYs7o0OX9J/H8jdSXIQKIWtILyZ6Ujc6Vef2U5az7H4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=hpymiSou4TBqPNTeXMxGnnTRQ8JgWdvbUwSrgRMQhtX1hkWHG6TSZ2ngS9RgLAxl1ik3JQtqgy5MiCkvwGUspr3eQ6P/86V1BiMGl2H/3IFJ5YrQGUFcYckYyE/D3tmGxIAZfcynxMTQE+tNkQZ9DvrLLPyzaWuYq1e15U3O8i4= Original-Received: by 10.86.62.3 with SMTP id k3mr692666fga.8.1205201076326; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [81.99.213.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm825825gvf.8.2008.03.10.19.04.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ADE115796E; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:04:33 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <47D5E749.8040101@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:58:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92122 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > Chong Yidong wrote: >> "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: >> >>> ARGS is totally missing from the doc string. >> >> Not so: >> >> Remaining arguments are strings passed as command arguments to PROGRAM. > > Thanks Chong and Bastien, it is there, but wouldn't it be good if it > were more explicit? "Remaing arguments ARGS" would perhaps be clearer. But ARGS is quite a standard way of referring to such remaining arguments... -- Bastien