* Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update
[not found] <87tz75ky97.fsf@tum.de>
@ 2009-02-08 11:09 ` Ralf Angeli
2009-02-08 11:30 ` Uwe Siart
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Angeli @ 2009-02-08 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: uwe.siart; +Cc: bug-auctex, emacs-devel
* Uwe Siart (2009-02-08) writes:
> I just follow the advice from the AUCTeX website to report RefTeX stuff to the
> AUCTeX lists. So I hope this is not OT.
>
> The info node (info "(reftex) Key Bindings") does not reflect that the extra
> binding prefix has been changed to "C-cC-y". Therefore at a first glance one
> might think that reftex-extra-bindings is broken in Emacs 23.
The bindings haven't changed in the standalone version of RefTeX, only
in Emacs.
I will not port this change to the standalone version because it misses
the point of `reftex-extra-bindings' deliberately putting the bindings
into the user's `C-c <letter>' key binding domain. I'd rather ask the
Emacs maintainers to back out the change in the Emacs repository.
--
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update
2009-02-08 11:09 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update Ralf Angeli
@ 2009-02-08 11:30 ` Uwe Siart
2009-02-08 16:44 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] " Leo
2009-02-08 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Siart @ 2009-02-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angeli; +Cc: bug-auctex, emacs-devel
Ralf Angeli <angeli@caeruleus.net> writes:
> The bindings haven't changed in the standalone version of RefTeX, only
> in Emacs.
>
> I will not port this change to the standalone version because it
> misses the point of `reftex-extra-bindings' deliberately putting the
> bindings into the user's `C-c <letter>' key binding domain. I'd rather
> ask the Emacs maintainers to back out the change in the Emacs
> repository.
I want to back this idea because things worked fine for me with the
"C-c" prefix.
--
Uwe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update
2009-02-08 11:09 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update Ralf Angeli
2009-02-08 11:30 ` Uwe Siart
@ 2009-02-08 16:44 ` Leo
2009-02-08 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2009-02-08 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel; +Cc: bug-auctex
On 2009-02-08 11:09 +0000, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>> I just follow the advice from the AUCTeX website to report RefTeX
>> stuff to the AUCTeX lists. So I hope this is not OT.
>>
>> The info node (info "(reftex) Key Bindings") does not reflect that
>> the extra binding prefix has been changed to "C-cC-y". Therefore at a
>> first glance one might think that reftex-extra-bindings is broken in
>> Emacs 23.
>
> The bindings haven't changed in the standalone version of RefTeX, only
> in Emacs.
>
> I will not port this change to the standalone version because it
> misses the point of `reftex-extra-bindings' deliberately putting the
> bindings into the user's `C-c <letter>' key binding domain. I'd
> rather ask the Emacs maintainers to back out the change in the Emacs
> repository.
I agree with Ralf.
What's the reason in changing it to ^C^Y?
Best,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: I use Emacs :.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update
2009-02-08 11:09 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update Ralf Angeli
2009-02-08 11:30 ` Uwe Siart
2009-02-08 16:44 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] " Leo
@ 2009-02-08 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-02-08 22:40 ` Reiner Steib
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2009-02-08 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: uwe.siart; +Cc: bug-auctex, emacs-devel
> I will not port this change to the standalone version because it misses
> the point of `reftex-extra-bindings' deliberately putting the bindings
> into the user's `C-c <letter>' key binding domain. I'd rather ask the
> Emacs maintainers to back out the change in the Emacs repository.
Indeed, IIRC we had agreed that this is a case of the user deliberately
deciding to let RefTeX use some of his reserved key-sequences. Maybe we
just forgot to back out the change. Does anyone remember why the change
hasn't been reverted?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update
2009-02-08 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2009-02-08 22:40 ` Reiner Steib
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Reiner Steib @ 2009-02-08 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: bug-auctex, uwe siart, emacs-devel
On Sun, Feb 08 2009, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I will not port this change to the standalone version because it misses
>> the point of `reftex-extra-bindings' deliberately putting the bindings
>> into the user's `C-c <letter>' key binding domain. I'd rather ask the
>> Emacs maintainers to back out the change in the Emacs repository.
>
> Indeed, IIRC we had agreed that this is a case of the user deliberately
> deciding to let RefTeX use some of his reserved key-sequences. Maybe we
> just forgot to back out the change. Does anyone remember why the change
> hasn't been reverted?
No. Here's the discussion:
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/93839/focus=95802>
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-08 22:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87tz75ky97.fsf@tum.de>
2009-02-08 11:09 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update Ralf Angeli
2009-02-08 11:30 ` Uwe Siart
2009-02-08 16:44 ` [Bug-AUCTeX] " Leo
2009-02-08 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-02-08 22:40 ` Reiner Steib
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).