From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: bug#3269: 23.0.93; C-mode text highlighting Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41:21 -0400 Message-ID: <87iqjygy8e.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <878wl1h5fw.fsf@ancient.thomaschristensen.org> <20090514213924.GB2413@muc.de> <20090518150643.GA12920@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242664934 32067 80.91.229.12 (18 May 2009 16:42:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 3269@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Thomas Christensen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 18 18:42:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M65uf-0005a5-7F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 18:42:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M65ue-0005ed-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M65tq-0005K1-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M65tl-0005Go-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55878 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M65tk-0005Gk-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:60785) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M65tg-0007Xc-Oq; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B30FF57E22A; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20090518150643.GA12920@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Mon, 18 May 2009 15:06:43 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110966 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:24457 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: >> The "foo" line has lost its fontification, and this is the bug. I know >> what's causing it, and it _might_ be easily fixable. What's more, I >> don't this bug was in Emacs 22 > > OK, here is a patch for half of the problem - it now fontifies a broken > string in a #define properly - just that you need to type M-o M-o after > the change. Would you check that this works properly please, Thomas! > > The second half of the problem is to fix it so that you don't have to > type MoMo afterwards. Any change you'll let me do this before this > week's pretest, Yidong? Could you test these patches on some large C files, to make sure they don't cause any additional performance problems? But if everything seems OK, please go ahead and check both patches in.