From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET merge question Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87iqftzegt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87eiql2w5s.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252420889 27231 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2009 14:41:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom Tromey , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 16:41:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ml1sn-00077J-CG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:41:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml1sm-0004Hf-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml1sg-0004G7-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml1sb-0004BB-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56452 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml1sb-0004Ag-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po32.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.88]:37337) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml1sa-0006od-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014244.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po32.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n88Ef67j029806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:41:06 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9590AC070; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:41:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (joakim@verona.se's message of "Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:11:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115129 Archived-At: joakim@verona.se writes: > Emacs hackers would still need easy access to these tools. Maybe this is > a further case for including something like Tom Tromeys ELPA in Emacs? Eric's still going to develop CEDET in his repository, so if you'll be hacking on CEDET, I think you should use the version of CEDET he has installed, instead of the version that will eventually be bundled with Emacs. This is a practical matter: since CEDET is such a large and complicated package, we shouldn't make changes directly to our copy of it, apart from those that are necessary to adapt it to Emacs' conventions and build system (which is what I've been working on). Instead, changes should be applied first to Eric's repository, then merged back into our tree.