unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:51:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iq9dwzya.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hptg8d4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>

David Kastrup writes:

 > > You're sidestepping the question.  The conditions you present are
 > > those that I refer to as "(first) allegiance to Emacs".
 > 
 > Your use of inflammatory language is likely doing more for your mood
 > than for your argument.

What's inflammatory about the well-known fact that Emacs developers
are very proud of their program and of free software, and are willing
to jump through hoops that very few projects require to contribute to
it?

 > > I know that David Kastrup has cried many tears over acquiring
 > > papers for AUCTeX, so that's one example of effort (but it's not
 > > yet integrated).
 > 
 > I've been asking on the list for help with this task, but it is
 > extensive and not particularly gratifying work.  As you should be
 > well aware of.

Been there, done that, use the T-shirt to mop up kitchen spills, yes.

Success is very gratifying, though.

 > It is not to my credit that I have not yet completed it.

Nor is it to your *dis*credit that you haven't, necessarily; that's
for you to judge, not anyone else.

 > There are valid and legal reasons discussed with the legal counsel of
 > the FSF for requiring copyright assignments for core GNU components such
 > as Emacs.

I'm not talking about removing that requirement; I'm talking about
putting more effort into getting assignments, and other strategies
(incorporating an FFI, or a full package system) that might bring
Emacs closer to the rest of the community.  Refusing to add FFI or a
full package system are not legally required to protect Emacs as
distributed by GNU; they are strategies intended to raise annoying
technical obstacles to doing what is already either clearly legal (for
individual users) or illegal (for distributors).

 > There is nothing arbitrary involved as you try to insinuate
 > with your verbiage of "pledging allegiance".

Indeed, loyalty is an arbitrary criterion.  But what bothers you so
much about loyalty?  Is it somehow opposed to software freedom?




  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-03  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-01 18:53 Fwd: CEDET sync Lluís
2010-03-01 18:59 ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-01 19:36   ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-01 21:27   ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-01 22:07     ` Fabian Ezequiel Gallina
2010-03-01 22:42     ` Eric M. Ludlam
2010-03-02  7:58       ` AW: " Berndl, Klaus
2010-03-02  8:51         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-02  9:35           ` David Kastrup
2010-03-02  9:43             ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-02 10:36               ` AW: " Berndl, Klaus
2010-03-02 10:43                 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-02 11:08                   ` AW: " Berndl, Klaus
2010-03-02 21:03                     ` Juri Linkov
2010-03-03  3:20                       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-05 13:45                         ` Michael Sperber
2010-03-05 17:07                           ` read syntax for window configs (was: CEDET sync) Drew Adams
2010-03-05 17:48                             ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-06 17:44                               ` read syntax for window configs Juri Linkov
2010-03-06 17:48                             ` Juri Linkov
2010-03-06 19:32                               ` Drew Adams
2010-03-18 16:07                             ` Michael Sperber
2010-03-18 16:41                               ` Drew Adams
2010-03-19 10:48                               ` martin rudalics
2010-03-19 11:09                                 ` Michael Sperber
2010-03-19 13:07                                   ` martin rudalics
2010-03-19 15:31                                     ` Michael Sperber
2010-03-02 11:13                   ` AW: Fwd: CEDET sync Richard Riley
2010-03-02 11:42                     ` David Kastrup
2010-03-02 15:23             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-02 16:06               ` David Kastrup
2010-03-02 17:20                 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-02 17:58                   ` David Kastrup
2010-03-03  3:51                     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-02 18:40                   ` OT: threats to Free Software (was: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync) Stefan Monnier
2010-03-02 19:33                     ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-02 22:07                     ` David Reitter
2010-03-03 22:48                       ` Richard Stallman
2010-03-03  4:00                     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-03 22:48                       ` Richard Stallman
2010-03-03 10:37                     ` Richard Stallman
2010-03-03 10:37                   ` AW: Fwd: CEDET sync Richard Stallman
2010-03-03 18:37                     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-03 19:00                       ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-05 20:05                       ` Richard Stallman
2010-03-06  4:29                         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-06  7:45                           ` David Kastrup
2010-03-03  7:07               ` joakim
2010-03-02 15:25         ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-02 15:59           ` AW: " Berndl, Klaus
2010-03-02 16:08             ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-02 16:44               ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-02 20:28                 ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-03  4:06                   ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-03  4:47                     ` Miles Bader
2010-03-03  7:21                       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-03 15:45                         ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-03  7:41                     ` David Kastrup
2010-03-03  8:51                       ` Stephen J. Turnbull [this message]
2010-03-03  9:10                       ` tomas
2010-03-03 10:02                         ` David Kastrup
2010-03-03 16:51                           ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-03-02 18:45             ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-03 10:38           ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iq9dwzya.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp \
    --to=stephen@xemacs.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).