From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a canonical key for S-tab? Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:19:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87ipikis87.fsf@gmail.com> References: <m1obsc670y.fsf@gmail.com> <m2lingr89c.fsf@igel.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330856365 4164 80.91.229.3 (4 Mar 2012 10:19:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 04 11:19:25 2012 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1S48XC-00017L-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:19:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1S48XC-0002Yo-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S48X9-0002Yj-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:19:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S48X8-0000rS-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:19:19 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S48X8-0000rN-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:19:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S48X6-00015M-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:19:16 +0100 Original-Received: from cab14-1-88-177-10-57.fbx.proxad.net ([88.177.10.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:19:16 +0100 Original-Received: from antoine.levitt by cab14-1-88-177-10-57.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:19:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 7 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cab14-1-88-177-10-57.fbx.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148887 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/148887> 04/03/12 11:05, Andreas Schwab > backtab > > Andreas. Any reason not to use (kbd) for this kind of things? Isn't the string representation less likely to change between platforms?