From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why post-command-hook so difficult to debug? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:58:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipc8dbeq.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87y5l5sbcq.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87r4qwddku.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345791499 12865 80.91.229.3 (24 Aug 2012 06:58:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 24 08:58:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4nqV-0001Mx-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:58:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4nqT-0006u4-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4nqK-0006tw-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4nqJ-0001Oq-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:37964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4nqJ-0001Ok-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB442D246B; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:58:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w10WW9xo-LPh; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:58:06 +0200 (CEST) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender noch tsdh@gnu.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (tsdh.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.67.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B2A2D2465; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:58:06 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:41:14 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 141.26.64.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152789 Archived-At: Leo writes: >> I tried removing `tags-completion-at-point-function' from >> `completion-at-point-functions' but the error persists. So it seems I'm >> the culprit although I cannot spot the problem... > > Are you sure that nrepl-send-string-sync returns all completions in > strings? Yes. To be extra sure, I added a (assert (null (remove-if 'stringp completions))) which doesn't trigger any error, but the error in `completion-in-region--postch' is still there... Bye, Tassilo