From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:19:05 -0500 Message-ID: <87ip45hseu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130401202613.0b4201e3@anarchist> <87li91nmhp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364915960 6315 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2013 15:19:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 17:19:48 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN2zu-0004h3-VF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:19:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN2zW-0000Uv-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN2zP-0000Nt-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:19:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN2zK-0000nw-Qf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:19:10 -0400 Original-Received: from uranium.truman.edu ([150.243.165.48]:34879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN2zK-0000nN-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from belanger-office (vh213601.truman.edu [150.243.162.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uranium.truman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A8031282FA; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:19:05 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <87li91nmhp.fsf@gnu.org> (Jose E. Marchesi's message of "Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:30:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 150.243.165.48 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158541 Archived-At: > Not that onerous? The Canonical Individual Contributor License > Agreement requires you to explicitly authorise Canonical to license the > contributed software under a proprietary license. See section 2.3 of > the agreement. I don't know if onerous is the right word, but I find this incredibly surprising. There is a GNU project where, if you want to contribute, you have to explicitly say that your contributions can be put under a proprietary license. Why would this be a GNU project?