From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:40:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87io582m91.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9kscqig.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vb98jqwp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pozgjnry.fsf@gnu.org> <83lha4jly2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447278096 23369 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 21:41:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 22:41:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwd8q-00026O-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:41:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwd8q-0007mA-V5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:41:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwd8m-0007jg-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwd8j-0003Os-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:41:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]:33152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwd8j-0003Ol-0D; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so5023670wme.0; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:41:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZeWCyvTZ0f5aD5HzLCHgtXQWeslAZXqBSkg7ZRSPu5Q=; b=yLcHQYysrN1aEGgYJ6qPNC0p0N3rQtAerkjwh8Me05DkwLCzLf6PMZPId2dvR8IFoE fsxJoD9VrC+vtRapkWFt1Mq0Q1jbpngNXhTe2XXp/qcwb4artQB5zPUlSsnO9DMsPUx7 rbTmg8nVjnzYbO8HYJGPgfGBXGR+HSjkjSZksetw8fUxnWE0deiIHl4kHiCv2YIcM6ai Fnjfc4Ety7B5MdjYG7OemcjisUdxa4HFn/vlRGyZPeXvlVGVVpaOqgDn4EPN8IpHI/c5 DWZ+3orQczsnFToScv5cztAbjksV4TLXdjxfIeBWJdqdC5WH5UNuM5p+HRgoF9y+dtVE fKSg== X-Received: by 10.194.159.100 with SMTP id xb4mr12372762wjb.136.1447278072502; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:41:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Gandalf-Linux.gmail.com (host-92-12-87-116.as43234.net. [92.12.87.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t126sm27281081wmd.18.2015.11.11.13.41.10 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:41:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:44 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194156 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > Out of interest, who has a passionate feeling that it should be the defau= lt? I do. I can summarize why later, if desired. But I=E2=80=99d _really_ rather not, because I know it=E2=80=99ll start up one of those discussions that do= esn=E2=80=99t go anywhere.