From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bat-mode: Inconsistent fontification. Consider using font-lock-function-name-face Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:49:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87imq02aq9.fsf@gmx.de> References: <3668c95a-d8a0-1e31-c663-297ac684a8f1@secure.kjonigsen.net> <8336h42ocy.fsf@gnu.org> <72cef0cb-d24b-4510-b73d-eced05d40bc0@www.fastmail.com> <83v9u010q8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="111899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: jostein@kjonigsen.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 10 21:58:01 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7mH2-000Sxa-I5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:58:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7mH0-00089S-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7m8k-0001Sk-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:49:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7m8i-0006ci-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7m8h-0006b8-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:49:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1568144947; bh=11gfihgmJAziVhsbbWtjBG0tD9jViB5NZYw7XWApip4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=D2aIGznQtO4F9Hpv5ZPvflhkE0PDPbqpVwxxKnDAZrPuV2CCrbmqJTPlClYTZIzrc kRSi/rCsquWYPx0BMjXyQRAWPt1ZGXFYvTCG0w4PCnjY6XKuKf4/rIXTPlJZS218jG fCoPIRLKfrHJs/O73Dr65TZfvl+2bDNPVfA98MtU= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.91.238.162]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIPhr-1i82Jw2YIx-004BkZ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:49:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83v9u010q8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:10:23 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:CfTdAr+7OQK7ve/VnbDvNT8wwMET89OsJO2FRqd2W1W6Xzu8oZh n6R9Gw8NN6utdpfN6v3iNSeIv9qfb2vDS88HFaddzMp5B1qKytF8A6o37JwVxW4Cg4XTrSv 9gbIGhaaqdHkBzbCZy8RgXHARVq6lsUv7WD12VIlZdKRoZKQtW7O4+ERGERrjG4Lf59+Zsq QuCqJvILBsHqHXdCcruqw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Jxl6AfLKazo=:QvYRNNGA4QfkWfIfGNkREV Vx7Ws7/c+Tl5JJ8jfE5vkB95Xdf94JvecD9uOGJR23+n4QY3TBXESifW/gpjEOs5QKHwCjSkP qwMkiFCGxaNkJtA7hTpIjgEEPdo4WrBmTfQgtgIy/Nd+CrzBAYS4853YmZs2hPdzmbJU92kjF XK1lba3J9UcvRPtMu+kduvnF+en9P0W3GlRznv9JM8Q4LnY2+9WSopufhz/3ZnUzEORFmNLl0 HyvERpN5DdWJnsflgoxzQXidsNmYFOx21QmWLyI5qaSx7Xc2F99YHAp6J21Qh+1ywVU3JAATX pvRxeWRm8+PysXef3cchnbOPPSGDIs0ALZb/I/Ja3137sPIEmaCsr2VQncOn+bLsqv2Y1ojGb 2DMKjDvnFMWgLqLL2DPrPN88NffMiU3+DB0CU9YpgKlJcsTV/OMxQKfM52J4mQMhw9SvlkrbS fh9KMVRIp9Fv2SvA5ohR85ci1Elw9O+XJxmjlDr86Arthd3sJzQCrZjM72F1HYNb61RUO4tmE PDSoZKadp7cYjj/IP4q+1cFII6+7DHV/voyZ/pzrqRaTSw/XzDeuaAfLNDJ1xc3DLwrEg/PwB Xe0LPZqq0LlhpXLS24BiujtyA9arF45FYdoL4o76khE2+zZ5EiqjMim1WUI7gedzwz+47N6k/ 5lftHFUN0eRslwOKNHnaF+OH8Z/mGKh4RD8YUIZobdslR1ocl3i2BfO4KkKwQlsKqFlj2V4E/ R5LiJ6/f8IRUKG1vf7BaOvnaCYk6xqC5bQj+dLyQRKxa2WZuwbBVYMnOCd85VYAfwN4NuxhA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239985 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The moment new faces are added I expect users to start complaining > that these faces are not supported by this and that foo-mode. So mode > authors aren't forced to implement them only in theory, IMO. For modes in elpa, there is also the backward compatibility problem. So they cannot feel forced to apply such new faces directly. Asking for similar faces for similar syntactic entities in different modes is legitimate. IMHO. These new faces give mode authors a hint how to provide own customized faces as long as necessary. And moving to the new faces will happen over the years only. Best regards, Michael.