From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:13:49 +0800 Message-ID: <87imhmx4si.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87d0845msg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h7xgjasw.fsf@yahoo.com> <0B01B576-3DC7-4FAE-8010-C9B5CB6BA024@icloud.com> <87d084htcf.fsf@yahoo.com> <149F5B4D-F219-409C-A994-096C777259EC@icloud.com> <87v9lweynz.fsf@yahoo.com> <74B639DD-3775-4BE7-B0B2-300B5CE62E14@icloud.com> <87k12bewpq.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o8rnacxr.fsf@yahoo.com> <877dyaye21.fsf@yahoo.com> <87blnlbnba.fsf@yahoo.com> <87v9lsqgqw.fsf@yahoo.com> <87lfmmpet2.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="95656"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: me@enzu.ru, joseph.h.garvin@gmail.com, Richard Stallman , stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, pcr910303@icloud.com, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, ndame@protonmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 26 06:16:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSYin-000Onp-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 06:16:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSYil-0000dM-Sl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:16:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSYhz-0007zW-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSYhy-0005Li-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic309-49.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.184.175]:39864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSYhx-0005CI-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:15:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1587874556; bh=AtJqMKBaX98Gz+mbkrQJHut4puduzXosqBpIRyB5qBg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=bsCFq/1VSwArC+EgjqmmlCBKyypDGII+e+24rl0d1OXgCUyPW6bEZ6/zPXDYqZMTf/BQ2vivrskTJ6knpsMLPECfRNbap6WEmuDRBtIdob5X/GCCcocgpk2bvprITQ+LwauSutzZj5lc76eTamvaC63qOlGWedb6zvdoEbMY2+kJJL21kQf135TlbgxaNuFQppKZhg2lEQ8j79M/g/9KvRNlg4p4KAAIyFIaFccaAo5zGMskAjR/5wDHk6ia36smPEr7xHLBVAaPV5a/R6S0alRrL+VTvuG5h7hGiQNZztrfM+ZSIF9WR/y+bx8PhD2SJlUrLQBeqLYhj3Owli0SYA== X-YMail-OSG: N_6BpMEVRDvd.miR6A7lED5GPdAEx7ojsA-- Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 04:15:56 +0000 Original-Received: by smtp426.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID cbccdd2b87b63f658b8e885b3848eddb; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 04:13:53 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:23:35 -0400") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15756 hermes Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.6) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.184.175; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic309-49.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/26 00:15:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 X-Received-From: 66.163.184.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247822 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I know for a fact that I operate on several different definitions of > what constitutes "Elisp", yes ;-) Fair enough, then. Thanks for clearing it up.