From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:03:53 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87im78w36m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18591"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, rms@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 19:02:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7ixO-0004h7-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:02:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7ixN-0002Kl-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:02:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7i3Y-00054F-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:04:36 -0500 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:41283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7i3W-0006gQ-CJ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:04:36 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.108.204 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-108-204.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.108.204]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACF852000A; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:04:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:12:38 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.200; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263889 Archived-At: > Why not C-x M-u for revert-buffer? Hard to type, follows the pattern > of "undo" which revert-buffer basically is, is free, similar to the > normal pattern of Emacs bindings where M- works on something larger > than something without. Then C-x M-g would be better, since 'g' will retain its connection with the key 'g' bound in special modes.