From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...] Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:47:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87im6osau6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87v9aqn5eq.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7ma7k5y.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuqa1ogn.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuqa5ug7.fsf@gnu.org> <87eehdy5ie.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuq98gdl.fsf@telefonica.net> <87pn0x8f8l.fsf@telefonica.net> <87mtw1s1jk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21307"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 09:50:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD1UR-0005Ry-1P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:50:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44734 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD1UQ-0005FU-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:50:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD1Rn-0003c6-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:47:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:45350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD1Rl-0007RJ-Dx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id f7so5743871wrt.12 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:47:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=h0AkBx6IB/74Oz+H+fkxZPpEKrqIzoV3haTyPXCxh5A=; b=C5sIrlMz+N/I9jIKFZedmz+jkv7KMTSXG3i601FMo3OboHJXXNk5XbupFP0EC4t5Y1 T0IuncQtw5ltXV+b+3fZaQDhbqy8PA8bvKKxvKlw2TAd1atDDjuCJZXziovAtrNPQa0F UwnqHM54tOmMiF5ayxvWnUj89DuFEGmlFlqxkP4AHK+7GdC0gFlH8ki4ztOb5aLZjnDj YNCMTWEYJMy27yDY8zLssU55GIG6hxRLcju2KT8nmI9pz6mqxLyChe+qy9EP1xXR+Xbe I8zuG47CHnjK95MADAUxGYcs8vXk6hZ+5/vPNsGrlT0swX15cf1O1tgFdSVBX8BDG3x4 FWAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=h0AkBx6IB/74Oz+H+fkxZPpEKrqIzoV3haTyPXCxh5A=; b=I8CUXjCjFykuCXlSceUjzDgaHZNlbsZLl6at8AES9AX8rNoGodu2wZrRVEmCY9htvg 9oa+UkizL2Yq7gQ2zz5svFkabnHAUL0Sl4MaMREzpGgEf7v9rL//ig/RgrRm+u/8uxwM aZ77Q/53a5KXIFfO60JrtZNLI2EB9howpd32BcyXp1GrM+53SyaH/WYbEhVUxYU/XaxP 7YPJXV4fxZmvvwXd1ySVnHdUfOu2rfz+aKHYm6voXnWcOy6N5sy+7mZcePiez0Hm9DUe aPI0hbn9Js7DVk5d9rkAIe8965Xxok/KXxwixu54zICjtotXIQzmyJOB5JlgC/mmgj3z rSMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LnUdwV11cda5sBNdEMYL6Qf4WPdB9J5NCl2Y3KhEooy4xeA5P 05OUz07McWrQJmc3KVk8Q9/Px0V1xux4wA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaJZm+DITVSvqGgprQWaI6CVAnhUfJ6w3Il0WcNv0hyYZqZJQcuxqf4u1ikafsZoRlXSQE/Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f00c:: with SMTP id j12mr7853484wro.160.1613724451445; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:47:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:2154:6435:5293:4d19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z15sm15070312wrs.72.2021.02.19.00.47.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:47:30 -0800 (PST) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Yuan Fu's message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:15:18 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265213 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:15:18 -0500, Yuan Fu said: Yuan> Does the current implementation allow a user to modify the tagging? It Yuan> is possible that the author tagged a command as mode-specific but a Yuan> user want to use it elsewhere, or the author tagged a command wrong. The user can always override the author's specification by putting a completion-predicate on the command in question (this would be a good use for the 'always' function people have been discussing in a different thread). Robert