From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] icomplete-vertical Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:17:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87im4ze92f.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87h7kkwcy1.fsf@posteo.net> <83tuokb0uk.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8er3i8z.fsf@posteo.net> <87blar3glt.fsf@posteo.net> <20210406142550.n3yllbw7cigsia6w@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gregory Heytings , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 06 17:26:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTnbP-0002CZ-II for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:26:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTnbO-00058O-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:26:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTnSp-00009Z-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTnSe-0005rg-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:17:59 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2C62400E5 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:17:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1617722266; bh=DsAKDVRz6ftUqRvT0TNDSIghIPBXyWlJIlYx7ts4WHI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=XGM9TgC5mhpJRfyrT+Iw1zgCP8kIij19Ro6wQnZDgUgCZNeF10LGqlWL+xHNj+qcv ew25s5yMWqLFiZ6B9k/PvKDlZlvjiTqpc8ElHOadWOgGtOBCg3STxCi2mulKi82tSA oNZV/ismMDqx5RlBOtXplhHtpgO+j0zLjFe80RSVLj75wAUKIUWJGiJMqHTVmOT3ey Wn0DKCZr6rALGmFUPFXVfWEoo6uZ3zcUIPeyTtWJ7QrxPOEElHFqrAZdbUK0h+aer1 qdxBu6TZHUY0806OLbl/bg6HRX5BoqsPKbYVttzE2mGydiP4VPGzr3n9Sg4clx2Xrw eNJKKVDvvds1g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FFB3Y1yswz9rxT; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:17:45 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20210406142550.n3yllbw7cigsia6w@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:25:50 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267480 Archived-At: Ergus writes: > The use case I had in mind was exactly that. Because I was working on > icomplete-vertical, icomplete-tabular, and some others that in general > just require minimal differences between each other. What would icomplete-tabular have looked like? -- Philip K.