From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Simple isearch concerns Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 22:12:15 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87im4w1tgw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <20210403001539.x4rb55dvh46rmhb3.ref@Ergus> <20210403001539.x4rb55dvh46rmhb3@Ergus> <878s5wmsjp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtubz4ls.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8735w22s9b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3ec7e2e58a3733a48ae9@heytings.org> <878s5tc0rn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3ec7e2e58a49d4f0ec99@heytings.org> <878s5t9p1i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <9ff81b52fad2911cc740@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13209"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 08 21:14:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUa6k-0003JN-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:14:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUa6j-0003hB-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:14:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUa61-0002tO-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:56563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUa5z-0007UP-0f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:13:40 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.107.223 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-107-223.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.107.223]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 427791BF206; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:13:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <9ff81b52fad2911cc740@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:48:56 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.201; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267657 Archived-At: >>> With C-p it's not clear (to me) if it should depend on the current >>> direction of the search or not. Should C-s C-p change the direction to >>> a backward search, or move to previous line and restart >>> a forward search? >> >> The same question applies to scroll-up-command and scroll-down-command, >> e.g. in a forward search using scroll-up-command should change >> the direction? > > For scroll-up-command and scroll-down-command that would not make sense: it > would mean that you start searching at window-end and search backward. Surely it should search forward after moving to window-end. But the question is: when the search direction was backward initially before calling scroll-up-command, should it keep the same backward direction, or should it change the direction to forward (since internally it used the forward search after moving to window-end).