From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Semyonov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestions for improvements to the *Completions* buffer Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87ilvhhy63.fsf@dsemy.com> References: <87pmpurtl9.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqpsspn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87fsqomyog.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqoh7w5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtkwkuzj.fsf@posteo.net> <86y24d7pdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v8zh63uy.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35125"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 22 08:55:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzwTQ-0008z7-9Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:55:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzwTO-0000mR-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 02:55:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzwSa-0008QX-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 02:54:52 -0500 Original-Received: from dsemy.com ([46.23.89.208]:48709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzwSY-0006x7-Jr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 02:54:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dkim; bh=AclmhweccnUKo 6Kz11q+C8DlKPUGYF+cUBhmC35HoRA=; h=in-reply-to:date:references: subject:cc:to:from; d=dsemy.com; b=uGqGOTO13MwAm3lqckaMJtUYx/5pifBupYf c8DXPPjY2W+PLVjkkpBmnHuCW8abB/InoyOg/GEmkTAtXvLDSSgqLz4cXTLUAY42XEfE5H 1jyg/hbFiPW+LiBW2NwwTQsiJBhc4r5HQ1LY9IT6+HypZrNbTopHKG0GmkHng1+vgSX2UZ hznkP9y7ZuHMF1DH/JiBydUAX0uAs/2prfKex/E8RU1TFNZVopPCDxfBHP6AkLEtt5rkcQ ui+vwLjKkDJOtefOW26wl4s6YZrFc37htCflDnz1H/O/MWZ/7cquZFXUqJccVPtyaU/goa egN1T85vv8E452QBcJDiRDzyreA== Original-Received: from coldharbour (bzq-79-177-205-127.red.bezeqint.net [79.177.205.127]) by dsemy.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 146700b7 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:54:47 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87v8zh63uy.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:32:37 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=46.23.89.208; envelope-from=daniel@dsemy.com; helo=dsemy.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282690 Archived-At: >>>>> Philip Kaludercic writes: > Juri Linkov writes: >> I agree it's a good idea to enable them both now, and hear any >> feedback for a month. > Done. > I'll be awaiting the angry mob. Hi Philip, Juri, I like these improvements overall, but I think 'completion-auto-select' should be split into two options (or allow more specific assignment) to differentiate between automatically selecting the *Completions* buffer when it appears and selecting it as part of "wrapping" (when 'completion-wrap-movement' is enabled). The former behavior is very jarring when using a package which automatically updates the *Completions* buffer (for example, ELPA package aggressive-completion), while the latter behavior could still be desired in such cases. I would post a patch but I don't have copyright assignment and have already contributed two small patches in the past, so I don't think it'd count as small enough. Thanks, Daniel