From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yoav Marco Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter integration on feature/tree-sitter Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:36:11 +0300 Message-ID: <87ilq9kerr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y1zabmbt.fsf@gmail.com> <5F186EBD-CD21-422B-8B4F-0D5424173334@gmail.com> <875ymdwf76.fsf@gmail.com> <011DA1A3-0FA8-4449-878A-FD6B336B0F1B@gmail.com> <8735hhw75p.fsf@gmail.com> <83czgks4ss.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnesuw63.fsf@gmail.com> <83pmkkqhft.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu9wukbt.fsf@gmail.com> <83ee10qbk7.fsf@gnu.org> <8F6A43D1-D1EA-4602-A245-627DB7960FC2@gmail.com> <838rr7qqhw.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfpekf6t.fsf@gmail.com> <838rr6pwjt.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmkik7x6.fsf@gmail.com> <83wneqoej5.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtfmk4oi.fsf@gmail.com> <83ee0yndor.fsf@gnu.org> <87r14xq2oc.fsf@thornhill.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8155"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.6.3; emacs 29.0.50 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 12:43:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1npSlJ-0001ts-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 12:43:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35266 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npSlH-0004BS-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 06:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npQpa-0007k6-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 04:39:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:37850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npQpY-00038t-Go; Fri, 13 May 2022 04:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id t6so10457726wra.4; Fri, 13 May 2022 01:39:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=33UMknEY0goVX5PSBKrrFVBx8IGx6Ci8wPXV4F0Wq+A=; b=S2ElrudaugZJHmnUsooV9s5K+tpx5m1aPkcgsu71pfCFY+avOuGGWORvRAKqUDUze6 36H/Jm6/uctZExn4cACpPOP1tiZrRL/7ZonPohvLtdWUEaN0I5vB74nardHj6g/wahds XPIPjfKnrQIKq8S5oxBvJEBiYgfs4hOA1tragtGb1vaHoHbRDavr0knKaFnrTu38sCfk OeLTbHzVCWubRA8EmkzO6Kw7LBbfdykLgzyRWs2E9n3MwvUHIN3LEA9PN5gHB2rk8ozX YxKUPENwgqiDR6yMps/9+lljSFZtuGaOlFlCaIwIlnXR845grysYCg1jV8A7/TOvx0bj LcPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=33UMknEY0goVX5PSBKrrFVBx8IGx6Ci8wPXV4F0Wq+A=; b=R3O8v3mr6347+B/c96uw+/fuEtc2oloTem8X1Z5N32HYxkUhsfhBZkpxUtNKyrOKdg qjRKuNF1oZBJdVjzziZn7xNk2PSc6OQevEZqeyKO+AHP0YmDxf615SzB6opbA8y/uD7/ otTWsRM+ouC2cV1lgXCoNod/a6co4f6BabKy41zZLu6fNNt/vgYJcUam8PNndU1ZE+6D /1xr9sJ/cMxPyXpAUGyV0by6XgFhzQbZvbTPc2Fwl3MUGUj7Z04yh0aPQBm9ML7N0gIV rq9M9pePN3FAY1BsixiPMK7k69Xau0ug7YwxnI1c6euLfWNM0AcfQh0hryu59F9QRdqg /mGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NYlRxUKfGikIaJLxsEVxu85zYlNWJszFKcr1eyj3E5gIcWcC/ DKnMVK5aOkAREowLX2o4aSg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLZh5OJstaRIt/h2ja6g19HMLcD41nwOdUPYb2oFNksj9gqoBi0LnkBrgePxd1uhSwHp4exw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:45c7:0:b0:20c:d8f3:8262 with SMTP id b7-20020a5d45c7000000b0020cd8f38262mr2965082wrs.496.1652431162186; Fri, 13 May 2022 01:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([77.126.101.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o37-20020a05600c33a500b003942a244edfsm1688096wmp.36.2022.05.13.01.39.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 May 2022 01:39:21 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87r14xq2oc.fsf@thornhill.no> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=yoavm448@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 May 2022 06:40:12 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289721 Archived-At: Theodor Thornhill writes: > I don't think that > parsing a c file with go queries is at all interesting, because the > parser would return errors all over and is clearly not how it is > supposed to be used. That was accidental and only in the first benchmarks regarding nconc. Later benchmarks use xdisp.c with actual C queries, so not to worry. - Yoav