From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter introduction documentation Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:45:44 +0000 Message-ID: <87ilht9i13.fsf@posteo.net> References: <9eb013da-d0fc-8e17-c6e3-1e8f913aebfa@yandex.ru> <83pmc50xxc.fsf@gnu.org> <71cfe4e8-3bb8-b0a6-9be5-8c0a6d92cfab@yandex.ru> <83h6xg29z3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn6cyey5.fsf@posteo.net> <787B1EB4-1925-4679-8747-449DCD685432@gmail.com> <87v8lt9lqy.fsf@posteo.net> <87mt759k5w.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34104"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Yuan Fu To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 30 13:46:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pBEmP-0008i9-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:46:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBElf-0002bb-TT; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 07:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBEld-0002Y9-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 07:45:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBElb-0004Fr-MZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 07:45:45 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5822401DD for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:45:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1672404341; bh=RNFrTYlMCeWpKvH7tjjY4HQbCqO3XRNXWYle2cseNks=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Uv+ZumDSCRtHLxg9IGUO7Q5RWsGCZgvqiwB8qoa0Zu+9A5xSCKLxSyNtFjZW3H87p j2SekqHgo/s3rQhhoO7zJTzbs+TcJjB+J6ebO2Un7ipBv+KbHJs75y8vnMhd47KJ6f Rp8YT/PeHz3j0yqFB1mOM37HIAIdS8wjBIW96PsBPViPNJhSjnf3xur14CijGqu2gd LEqMq3GQiCFK5+/O5TnZmDOHpskpZITQJP1V5SZDa9LgZjMVLpm66rB8aaHTEQ8m9G CMQkOYcl8yh5I65mPYcMh5Kobh6nwbsmjTlCH4tS279T8omC1ahO9BZy6/JCX8zYA0 HY3gKwIpP05RQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Nk4jt2Jmzz9rxG; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:45:38 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:27:06 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302099 Archived-At: tomas@tuxteam.de writes: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:59:39AM +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:25:25AM +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >> > >> >> If acceptable, it looks good. I could imagine that it should be OK if >> >> we point to GitHub, since we are just using it as a Git host. Here are >> >> a few suggestions >> > >> > I won't object, as long as I can excise it with my own >> > hands. I don't like to see how That Company silently >> > slithers into more and more basic infrastructure. >> >> What do you mean by "exercise"? Install the rules manually? > > I said "excise". More traumatic :-) Whoops, that makes more sense. >> Perhaps it would be better to download tarballs instead of cloning a >> repository of the depth 1? They are easier to configure and usually >> faster to download. The result should be the same anyway. > > Yes, perhaps. Personally, I try as hard as I can to keep a safe > distance between github and myself. Probably off-topic here going > into too much detail why. That is totally relatable. > Cheers & thanks nevertheless for your hard work :) I did nothing here, just wrote a 10-line diff and nagged a lot :)