From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:00:07 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hejt1ajc.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87adppy67u.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <3405-Fri21Jun2002183331+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <871yaz2tf8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <200206231813.g5NID8m24504@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024898647 16395 127.0.0.1 (24 Jun 2002 06:04:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 06:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, ats@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17MMxL-0004GK-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:04:07 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17MMyM-0001SJ-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:05:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MMwW-0003YK-00; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 02:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MMtW-0003TV-00; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 02:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9527CB84; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6567216B; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:00:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200206231813.g5NID8m24504@aztec.santafe.edu> (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:13:08 -0600 (MDT)") Original-Lines: 36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5137 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5137 Richard Stallman writes: > Can you arrange to see the list of directories in both cases, and > compare them? If they are different, can you find out where the > difference originates from? Sure. I changed the lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps rule as follows. The only difference it to write a timestamped file containing $$wins to /tmp. The resulting files (one from the X build, and one from the no-X build) were identical, but the cus-load.el files in the two resulting build trees were still different. custom-deps: cus-load.el doit wd=$(lisp); $(setwins); \ echo Directories: $$wins; \ echo $$wins | sort | perl -pe 's/ /\n/gmo' > /tmp/cdep-$$(datestamp); \ $(EMACS) $(EMACSOPT) -l cus-dep -f custom-make-dependencies $$wins If it matters, I perform the two builds in separate build directories using the standard "${srcdir}/configure ..." approach, and I perform a "make boostrap" for each. However, before we go any further, let me try this again using the unmodified upstream source. I should have thought to do that initially, but I didn't. So let me make sure this isn't being caused by any of the debian diffs. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD