From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps be using EMACS or emacs?
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:23:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87heja5mdi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020708165432.5505B-100000@is> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:56:06 +0300 (IDT)")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> Is there any other way to solve your particular problem? Some non-Unix
> platforms have problems with using $(emacs), so from my perspective it's
> best to leave $(EMACS) $(EMACSOPT) wherever possible.
Sure. There are several ways I can work around this. I had just
presumed that the build process would prefer the source tree versions
of the .el files, and so was surprised when my changes to
./lisp/custom-deps.el didn't have any (immediate) effect.
You might want to make a mention of this in the INSTALL docs though.
If I understand correctly, it means that anyone packaging (or
building) emacs who wants to make sure they don't build using stale
source might need to remove a previous copy of emacs from their system
before building. Of course this would only be an issue for the
relevant files, like custom-deps.el, but an important change there
wouldn't have an effect until the build *after* the next install.
In any case, thanks for the help, and I'll just work around it
locally. Could I just use $(emacs) in preference to $(EMACS) in that
Makefile.in for the debian packages? We don't have any non-Unix-ish
platforms.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-08 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-07 2:55 Should lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps be using EMACS or emacs? Rob Browning
2002-07-08 13:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-07-08 14:23 ` Rob Browning [this message]
2002-07-08 16:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-07-09 18:52 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-23 17:10 ` Rob Browning
2002-07-25 18:07 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 19:45 ` Rob Browning
2002-07-26 18:44 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-26 19:57 ` Rob Browning
2002-07-27 20:28 ` Rob Browning
2002-07-29 1:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-30 23:01 ` Rob Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87heja5mdi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org \
--to=rlb@defaultvalue.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).