From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower? Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:12:08 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hecud8ef.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> References: <87adpxob2n.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <200206152147.g5FLlfU10992@aztec.santafe.edu> <87bs5r1cyp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041315173 9627 80.91.224.249 (31 Dec 2002 06:12:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TFdz-0002V8-00 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 07:12:51 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18TFf1-0006P6-00 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 07:13:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18TFda-00081A-09 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18TFdN-00080q-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18TFdL-00080d-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gci-net.com ([216.183.68.100] helo=gci-net.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18TFdL-00080W-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [216.183.69.135] (HELO aris) by gci-net.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 5150315 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:11:14 -0700 Original-Received: from johnw by aris with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TFdI-0008FZ-00 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:12:08 -0700 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Public-Key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF40524D0 X-Home-Page: http://www.gci-net.com/users/j/johnw/ In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:48:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10379 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10379 >>>>> On Mon Dec 30, Richard writes: > After pressing "reply" to compose this e-mail, I went to the > first line of the message and typed "C-n" four times. I had my > co-worker time the pause on his stopwatch. It took 5 wall-clock > seconds for the cursor to move. > Can you use GDB to stop it while this happens? If you do that even > 4 times you will probably see where it is spending most of that > time. This issue is now closed. I discovered that the implementation of "wide-column.el" was the culprit. It was abusing the post-command-hook in a way that worked in 21.2, but not in 21.3. I have referred the problem to the author. John