From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:03:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbr6jwsy.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87637of4y8.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87oclfdzs2.fsf@kobe.laptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262318690 3061 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2010 04:04:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 04:04:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 01 05:04:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQYkl-0005KG-EI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:04:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQYkl-00021E-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:04:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQYkh-000211-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:04:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQYkc-00020Y-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:04:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49159 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQYkb-00020V-VB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:04:33 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46525) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQYkb-0004Bq-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:04:33 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NQYkX-0005Gr-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:04:29 +0100 Original-Received: from 217.red-88-24-214.staticip.rima-tde.net ([88.24.214.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:04:29 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 217.red-88-24-214.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:04:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.red-88-24-214.staticip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ayDx21hgQwYgQH32bAaxCLGe2xM= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119187 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Is there no way to fix an error in a commit message? You can undo a commit with `bzr uncommit'. However, this only makes sense if you are committing to some of your local branches. Once you send your change upstream, pretending to alter the revision is like asking for the removal of a message you published on a mailing list, because the history is replicated everywhere. Because of this and other more tehcnical reasons, NEVER use `bzr uncommit' against an upstream branch. You would only cause lots of misery. -- Óscar