From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and elsewhere). Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:57:24 +0900 Message-ID: <87hbahmkbv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87sju2hoee.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87pqp6vn3p.fsf@wanadoo.es> <874o6iicxp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <83mxkapb2g.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkoat20x.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83liztyeed.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipuxu3hb.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301714182 24133 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2011 03:16:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 03:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 02 05:16:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5rJw-0001kC-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 05:16:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56319 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5rJv-0007CP-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33960 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5rJq-00077V-Se for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5rJp-0007Tx-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:39322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5rJp-0007So-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9386A97031F; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:52:10 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB7C71A3A82; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:57:24 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.93a under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" eac2e6bd5b2c+ XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138051 Archived-At: Uday S Reddy writes: > Dear Oscar, In the subthread started by Stephen Turnbull, I have argued= =20 > that it is easy enough to decode revision numbers as long as they are=20 > referring to the mainline or the local branch. No, I've agreed that I'm not going to change your mind, that's all. "Easy enough" is a matter of taste. "De gustibus non est disputandum." I encourage =D3scar to stop wasting his time on this, too, as Stefan has pronounced the official policy.