From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DEFU* macro name for a extern DEFUN: DEFUE? DEFUNEX? Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:37:23 -0400 Message-ID: <87hba4tnx8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4DA295DB.20709@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302571784 27119 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2011 01:29:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 03:29:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from [140.186.70.17] (helo=lists.gnu.org) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9SQG-0002xA-Ib for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:29:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33168 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9SQG-0005YB-8f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9SPb-0003R3-Or for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9Pjb-0005vk-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]:48979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9Pjb-0005va-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:37:27 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014198.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3BMbNDP025621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA629160341; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:37:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4DA295DB.20709@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:47:07 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 140.186.70.17 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138402 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > I've been looking into trimming down the sets of symbols exported and > imported by each C source file in Emacs, down to the list of symbols > that are actually needed. This should make it easier to read the > code, and to do better static analysis, and shrink Emacs a bit by > removing unused cruft. I don't think this has been a problem for us in practice; there isn't sufficient justification to replace DEFUNS throughout the tree.