* feature request: daemonize
@ 2011-08-23 19:29 Neal Becker
2011-08-23 19:40 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-08-24 12:01 ` Rasmus
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Neal Becker @ 2011-08-23 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
It's nice that we have:
emacs --daemon
But here's what I need. I've started emacs without --daemon. Now it's time to
go home. I want M-x daemonize.
Feasible? The most obvious problem I can think of is it would need to close any
X-connections.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: feature request: daemonize
2011-08-23 19:29 feature request: daemonize Neal Becker
@ 2011-08-23 19:40 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-08-24 12:01 ` Rasmus
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-08-23 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
23/08/11 21:29, Neal Becker
> It's nice that we have:
>
> emacs --daemon
>
> But here's what I need. I've started emacs without --daemon. Now
> it's time to go home. I want M-x daemonize.
>
> Feasible? The most obvious problem I can think of is it would need to
> close any X-connections.
That'd be cool. A use case is when I need to restart the X server or to
log out for some reason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: feature request: daemonize
2011-08-23 19:29 feature request: daemonize Neal Becker
2011-08-23 19:40 ` Antoine Levitt
@ 2011-08-24 12:01 ` Rasmus
2011-08-25 12:12 ` GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 (was: feature request: daemonize) Tassilo Horn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2011-08-24 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> writes:
> It's nice that we have:
>
> emacs --daemon
>
> But here's what I need. I've started emacs without --daemon. Now it's time to
> go home. I want M-x daemonize.
>
> Feasible? The most obvious problem I can think of is it would need to close any
> X-connections.
Is this different from (server-start 1)?
Emacs GTK breaks most of the time when I close X. Especially after I've
switched to GTK3.
—Rasmus
--
Sent from my Emacs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 (was: feature request: daemonize)
2011-08-24 12:01 ` Rasmus
@ 2011-08-25 12:12 ` Tassilo Horn
2011-08-25 13:18 ` GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 Rasmus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2011-08-25 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus; +Cc: emacs-devel
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
Hi Rasmus,
> Emacs GTK breaks most of the time when I close X. Especially after
> I've switched to GTK3.
Oh, that's an issue I also see lately. I remember emacs used to survive
killing X11 when there was a console frame, but right now, that doesn't
work anymore.
I didn't think about GTK3 being the culprit, though.
Bye,
Tassilo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11
2011-08-25 12:12 ` GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 (was: feature request: daemonize) Tassilo Horn
@ 2011-08-25 13:18 ` Rasmus
2011-08-25 14:15 ` Jan D.
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2011-08-25 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org> writes:
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
> Hi Rasmus,
>
>> Emacs GTK breaks most of the time when I close X. Especially after
>> I've switched to GTK3.
>
> Oh, that's an issue I also see lately. I remember emacs used to survive
> killing X11 when there was a console frame, but right now, that doesn't
> work anymore.
>
> I didn't think about GTK3 being the culprit, though.
No idea. Earlier Emacs would survive X restarts if no GTK frames where
open. This no longer seems to be the case. Whether it is GTK3 or
something else I simply don't know. . .
—Rasmus
--
Sent from my Emacs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11
2011-08-25 13:18 ` GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 Rasmus
@ 2011-08-25 14:15 ` Jan D.
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan D. @ 2011-08-25 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus; +Cc: emacs-devel
Rasmus skrev 2011-08-25 15:18:
> Tassilo Horn<tassilo@member.fsf.org> writes:
>
>> Rasmus<rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>>
>> Hi Rasmus,
>>
>>> Emacs GTK breaks most of the time when I close X. Especially after
>>> I've switched to GTK3.
>>
>> Oh, that's an issue I also see lately. I remember emacs used to survive
>> killing X11 when there was a console frame, but right now, that doesn't
>> work anymore.
>>
>> I didn't think about GTK3 being the culprit, though.
>
> No idea. Earlier Emacs would survive X restarts if no GTK frames where
> open. This no longer seems to be the case. Whether it is GTK3 or
> something else I simply don't know. . .
>
It is really GLib that messes things up. GLib is used by GConf,
GSettings, DBus and (I think) rsvg.
Jan D.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-25 14:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-23 19:29 feature request: daemonize Neal Becker
2011-08-23 19:40 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-08-24 12:01 ` Rasmus
2011-08-25 12:12 ` GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 (was: feature request: daemonize) Tassilo Horn
2011-08-25 13:18 ` GTK3 emacs doesn't survive killing X11 Rasmus
2011-08-25 14:15 ` Jan D.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).