From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More test reports please Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:36:12 +0800 Message-ID: <87harz7xur.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y5lc292m.fsf@gnu.org> <874nnza2x1.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw7jnzz1.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345386993 7380 80.91.229.3 (19 Aug 2012 14:36:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 19 16:36:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T36c5-0006Ns-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:36:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53391 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T36c4-0003Vw-7A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:36:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T36c1-0003Vg-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:36:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T36c0-0003Fo-Pf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:36:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:33697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T36c0-0003Fk-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:36:20 -0400 Original-Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so6364086pbb.0 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:36:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dg/JxL1dUoP+7ShZ2ZJOrVdiqZwvH19boNg/9rl7cpE=; b=Skj1Qna0Umtq9yhwKEG7wkTJFbbh9dkcymAfJt8JHaacTk4cBJBea/DpkL2hNYxac/ JC+mZwt5w1skHi/yNAe0zzgxrCcONxIwTHcwDyVCUFhUUSFMkF3/ZX1GilkiGDaI7Kw8 HU889JV/QalmjhRAU3ruebGYLRrRw4ok/E0EHBcLdzOFm+J+DU3yB+OMuBoQAnePQrQS 5exgthJZLDMmiwUblO0JYEg+12Qw3ny0aAYcrvsIk3umYZgO+LqBl6EVq7FxXsyrLXwn Haat4UYv3D6DrQ8dFqkM1ocsBLVFuGyizx8zGe3ApJUky6BiZ2N4DViDm3+gd5BTRS5c yDfA== Original-Received: by 10.66.76.226 with SMTP id n2mr23024348paw.67.1345386979702; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ulysses (cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.80.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pg9sm9101989pbb.26.2012.08.19.07.36.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:36:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fw7jnzz1.fsf@wanadoo.es> (=?utf-8?Q?=22=C3=93scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Sun, 19 Aug 2012 08:43:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152677 Archived-At: =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: > Confirmed. This is Kubuntu 12.04 64 bits (a real machine, no VMWare): > > tar xzf emacs-24.2-rc1.tar.gz > cd emacs-24.2 > ./configure --prefix=3D/home/oscar/em-24.2 > make -j4 > make install > cd ~/em-24.2/bin > emacs -Q > M-x eshell > > Welcome to the Emacs shell > > ~/em-24.2/bin $ cd > usage: cd: (DIR) I still can't reproduce the problem. I'm also on Ubuntu 12.04. Can you confirm that the 24.1 tarball does not have this problem? If so, could you try bisecting using the emacs-24 branch? There are only ~80 revisions between 24.1 and 24.2, so it should not be difficult to find the problem if it's reproducible.