From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Remove set-mark-default-inactive? Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:01:18 +0800 Message-ID: <87hanx19bl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354939290 7409 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2012 04:01:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 04:01:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 05:01:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThBbj-0001Ld-DL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 05:01:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50472 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThBbX-0008Ja-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThBbS-0008Ic-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThBbQ-00040N-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:33057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThBbP-00040J-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id xa7so770707pbc.0 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:01:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=i3avntwkLaLcaqyNIq9YRRRNO5YDoqq+LQz7IYjiBg0=; b=JE/BQggDIi9mVB7LQt1ZahTgGWdwceATeJ1CkLeIik2eNM+G4pcGEXDRB+wpEiwzdJ O64YXmnK+Pwti9cE7lWD2BjiIhAW+IRAxkDh0JfVJOV9e+Q8dN2m8ody2jNYdLbPaWlX Yp9P/GFMJgbIPU9J9k+vXTkJlZ56lkNVB4BJ8j6V5LoNmErn0R/R/NItSTwjhwSYqdl2 OjGteUWshh+Ppk16AcNftqZ9H6LUoE6rL46nYFZ5Ya+z5tphYX+msmxdn84eaKjqzw7V CFZk3W9HgoZkYVgJbMNhLkeUJY+wluUTYCDwSqt5EzJy91+yOR7ykpK+wEWmO57QZjTJ lL3A== Original-Received: by 10.68.224.165 with SMTP id rd5mr21562624pbc.49.1354939282871; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:01:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ulysses (cm107.delta179.maxonline.com.sg. [59.189.179.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o11sm7762622pby.8.2012.12.07.20.01.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:01:21 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155356 Archived-At: The strange option `set-mark-default-inactive' was originally introduced in a commit of completely unrelated stuff: revno: 93291 committer: Stefan Monnier timestamp: Sun 2008-12-21 05:20:06 +0000 message: (completion-all-completions-with-base-size): Remove. (completion-all-completions): Don't set it. (completion-table-with-context, completion--file-name-table): Don't add base-size in last cdr. (completion-hilit-commonality): Add argument `base-size'. (display-completion-list, completion-emacs21-all-completions) (completion-emacs22-all-completions, completion-basic-all-completions): Provide it. (completion-pcm--all-completions): Don't need to remove the base-size in last-cdr any more. Is this an accidental commit of a local experiment? As far as I can tell, setting `set-mark-default-inactive' to non-nil is pretty much the same as disabling Transient Mark mode. (See also Bug#10964.) Should we simply delete this option?