From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:53:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87hakm72el.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <513997AD.5050901@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362729242 1140 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 07:54:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 07:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lele Gaifax , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Xue Fuqiao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 08:54:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDs8G-00006z-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:54:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54131 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDs7u-00026B-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDs7q-000261-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:54:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDs7p-0003h4-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:53:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:64383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDs7o-0003gs-UY; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:53:57 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm14so739323wib.4 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:53:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ZJ74kftU3Iu08b0VOksVKZPgWMpl/jxj6k+nUh58KDc=; b=KXVzceW2foMHJDEhBXZ+RIfchE9lkWfmdHcNiXRFEf8rndWx29KBit9jWeCdxpjRiD OLX0pDAB5+/pDPaBPO4dfNPl0aKs7eg8q7qXQs6ppjGdsBUGo/XoitWxdsUCcg6i2yvN 7vL/jMyI4c9tx791htFbNeaUooyVrgNCtKeWgHKXoqhpeH4T/Z95vZNIBdi4B04th00T l5tVCqGt7Dr2jWrb2+sVFv4PwPgM/x3/2oB6AsmaQQYL2ELpfx+z12CyNAjo4/tFbL5P LPRc60OjCF0oHZDCboJkeX3NPkg/k+x9yFLI/Fuw9ne1oPZ/ktMiUrfd/KaAw8qMOHlw eYgw== X-Received: by 10.194.121.6 with SMTP id lg6mr1920007wjb.22.1362729235669; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:53:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex1sm7698042wib.7.2013.03.07.23.53.54 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:53:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D1B711C218DA; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:53:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <513997AD.5050901@gmail.com> (Xue Fuqiao's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:47:57 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157581 gmane.emacs.orgmode:67903 Archived-At: Xue Fuqiao writes: > On 03/08/2013 02:40 PM, Bastien wrote: >> I missed the distinction between "pretest" and "release candidate". > > What's the difference between "pretest" and "release candidate"? Doesn't > the latter belong to the former? The rc1/rc1.1 was released on the > "pretest" directory. Maybe this is just a difference of degree: only fix really-very-very- critical-regressions in rc, while fix bugs in pretest (and "rc" maybe is just the name for the last pretest releases, so a subset of them.) With two "maybe" I'm not helping very much, sorry. -- Bastien