From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:50:58 -0600 Message-ID: <87hagu2oql.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87d2rkb1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvwfa3ev.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371649879 303 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2013 13:51:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:51:19 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 15:51:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpIn7-0003qO-TK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:51:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpIn7-00036u-JF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpImw-0002uL-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpImr-0002ZU-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:51:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpImr-0002Yo-16 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JDoxXH023183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-102.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.102]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5JDowZ2007866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:50:59 -0400 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:48:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160663 Archived-At: Lars> Would it make more sense for eww to use new buffers every time? eww Lars> would have a backlog of, say, ten buffers, and going back to the Lars> previous page would just mean popping to the previous buffer. And it Lars> could use `bury-buffer' and rename the previous buffer to a name with Lars> something leading with " " when you go to a new page. FWIW w3m reuses the buffer by default, but lets you request a new buffer when following a link. That is, it works like other web browsers, where a click usually reuses the tab, and middle-click or whatever opens a new one. Tom