From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:39:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87ha7jc9h5.fsf@engster.org> References: <87ha7tr5bo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ppmhecd8.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y50z90pd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87txbn8r6x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8338j717oe.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjlf6tdx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sir7yue7.fsf@gnu.org> <8761o3dlak.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83bnxuzyl4.fsf@gnu.org> <871tyqes5q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87a9ddg7o8.fsf@engster.org> <87d2i9ee8t.fsf@engster.org> <874n3ke1qn.fsf@engster.org> <87vbvzcjv9.fsf@engster.org> <87iorz18fy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393616405 17575 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2014 19:40:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 20:40:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTI4-0006KW-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:40:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTI4-0005s1-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTHw-0005mC-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:40:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTHq-0001br-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:54865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTHp-0001bf-Sy; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:39:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=nRkCe1izVgjkPF3NC/noyrfhSD0IujTCTQCNGA8dK84=; b=ZJGxw0YEn0PMcY+ZbClBiBWTZJhGbHZ7RXVY7s18iXo8VkOHiveCzusObriICt6Ul82uBX7mjolejCmXqYhlgDeNYH1qguzLQd0nTf5u+Glb1YdLCz01SbjdSMLl6Mft; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-052-078.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.52.78] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTHn-0000s0-VW; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:39:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87iorz18fy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:57:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169957 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > That opinion is redundant. We have already established that this is not > a voting process or shouting match, so do everyone a favor, read up in > the discussion, and contribute something to it once you have figured out > something that has not already been said and that actually applies to a > policy decision. Fair enough. I will no longer pollute this thread with my redundancy as to not divert attention from your lucid postings. Maybe we can set up some kind of moderation queue, so that you can review my mails before they reach the list? That would surely be most helpful. L a f p RET'ly yours, David