unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Unary /
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:54:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9lswdmg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22047.37539.943171.429065@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:48:51 +0900")

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org> writes:

> David Kastrup writes:
>
>  > In Elisp, (/ 2.0) returns 2.0.  In Common Lisp
>  > <URL:http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/lw50/CLHS/Body/f_sl.htm>
>  > (and in Scheme), this returns 0.5.
>
> Also in XEmacs (/ 2.0) => 0.5.  Just a bug in Emacs, I bet.

Hardly a bug since it matches the function DOC:

/ is a built-in function in ‘src/data.c’.

(/ DIVIDEND &rest DIVISORS)

Return first argument divided by all the remaining arguments.
The arguments must be numbers or markers.

[back]

> So I guess the Common Lisp behavior isn't particularly useful, either
> or somebody would have reported sooner. :-)

At least it's a good data point that XEmacs has it the other way round.
That suggests that at least packages common to both Emacsen do not rely
on either definition in important code.

That makes it more of a temptation to change it after all this time.

-- 
David Kastrup



  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-15 11:30 Unary / David Kastrup
2015-10-15 11:48 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-15 11:54   ` David Kastrup [this message]
2015-10-15 12:00   ` Tassilo Horn
2015-10-15 12:17     ` David Kastrup
2015-10-15 13:31       ` Stefan Monnier
2015-10-15 14:02         ` David Kastrup
2015-10-15 18:45           ` Stefan Monnier
2015-10-15 19:20             ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-15 12:09 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h9lswdmg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).