From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw_Wojnowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:39:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9ktsi6a.fsf@cumego.com> References: <87d1vvfa1k.fsf@cumego.com> <87r3k95ppo.fsf@cumego.com> <87mvuomik1.fsf@cumego.com> <87bnb4nqvz.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8qoxjez.fsf@cumego.com> <87r3jzhvz2.fsf@cumego.com> <87vb9aojhi.fsf@petton.fr> <87wptpsjhv.fsf@cumego.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447187989 12645 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 20:39:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 21:39:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFhY-0005cX-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:39:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFhX-0007lt-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:39:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFhT-0007kt-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:39:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFhP-0001ku-Pr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp23.iq.pl ([86.111.242.228]:57927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFhP-0001jo-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 26171 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 20:39:26 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO namek.cumego.com) (esperanto@cumego.com@[159.205.193.173]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp22.iq.pl with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Nov 2015 20:39:26 -0000 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:32:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.111.242.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193967 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > I like it. I'm not a big fan of the name "obarray-foreach", since we're just > choosing a different name for "map", without much existing precedent for doing > so. I'd prefer "obarray-map". I was thinking about "map" suffix, but decided not to used it, because "map" functions return something meaningful and this one only nil. :-|