From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] master 88578a4: Increase the default number of hits Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:22:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9iw1jdf.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20151224213932.12107.84317@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87wps1ghyu.fsf@gnus.org> <0xd1ttrmgp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si2oq5z2.fsf@gnus.org> <90mvswd7ej.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ege8l98o.fsf@gnus.org> <87si2lppuq.fsf@gmx.de> <87fuyhpq28.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451722949 31131 80.91.229.3 (2 Jan 2016 08:22:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 09:22:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aFHS6-0006m7-No for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:22:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37732 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFHS5-0004X7-OG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 03:22:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFHRz-0004Wz-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 03:22:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFHRv-0000fP-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 03:22:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:58746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFHRu-0000f4-OD; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 03:22:06 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.82.121]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnPGI-1ZkuRf1cXG-00hb9F; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:22:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 02 Jan 2016 07:44:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:15B0lX0mYGbtNRUhmxMXHikEXY4ErSBIV2SmPVbKA+XuRhGNE6L yyOESAdvI39NWZWGcoWe3ZN5ZR2JMAa+n/jfEDxt9kAfyXcG9ZBe5wEV0Bt8yNq1dwdOTfS tymhaEZPXgbcE7h3H2+DsG/L2kRq8Bw0xemijRaeyxVt9B21yz8++KvgmP9Zj0tbaZLOaLF VHN/CuWNUBHayRXZZ2kYQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:KpMvkeqJyf4=:klUJkddrJ9FPoodUqHQUyc SYN9NDJmQZnpwbAxQ86fTzSZi90RfbY+BMui9Bn07A6Mp7zjElGFQTYIfnAJ34jHGpSiRDrz6 QeeQLonKsGHtZehPGV/hN3r2NyoUuPD/Q0GHrWq8mxfmrL3RiECxU9BIuL+FMMMKqkMWwggQW ZakhEFHV/gHcL71Aq/lPZKgQtc3297N9MriviCuMSEEcA4GzBVLG+q4KfBf16vc7MsSqrs01D /2MjLNB+t09sNxZn1gUYPtuI4VHRxmfS52trH1M6/kJ2YtimOJ7yQ7YrZJ4c3MEOpf4vRRn4A 7uKJZsT7N8mheFq3JYwkWGia4QkKH3PI0jhVScu52OQ6DQ5mp2xAqmYOzgEV7WcpTZpvEm4GC zY5aMZHcKvjnmizWb3hMqbgJ4QlDTWJxphKQya5PBbM173vsKFFgCKXIBp3pWgf/lWLQXZ8Ua +RkObr+/85F9bMODTYrO3E+aZC4q9FjljWv6hgQYDdjoIRbPPD+mBDki4SVi/z+L0t3+/cxsf AjYF7CexYM3v6znC64xjEr2qUSldNxG1zteKRsGPbE3pBhXJ/XrmptV1E7xIvrHIyW+paWAZb RQpbt4cXac1XBFIRHlm7gtrkTfvaz7e3gvS+WVXqfBlZ2FmWBBpTO9e9m6X8voQTv3rp59XPO khzwFsrlvbc2lVWQtQsnSxqxltLyOUlR3QUO2zBPI+wuq2+XR0rQo1nL5RHA36vZ3Ona227CC Qj9SOHjjORehOfJWUpWr54hcFS3TabsaR7JStCwDYwKaeKAf5t79wYH93N/Jc7mp0MfZ611J X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197347 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I've been trying to debug the charset issue, but I'm failing because I > can't get it to debug properly. > > I think the issue may be with encoding as utf-8 (in a multibyte buffer), > and then base64-ing the result, which will most likely make base64 > encode each character as a series of bytes, and it's already been > encoded as utf-8, so... double. I'll check later. Maybe you create a ticket, in order not to forget? Thanks, and best regards, Michael.