From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More tags/usertags on Debbugs? Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:57:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9ij3n4l.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83oacvnr6l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452542350 21974 80.91.229.3 (11 Jan 2016 19:59:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kaushal Modi To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 20:59:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aIicG-0007AD-G0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:59:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIicF-00074B-M8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:58:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIiaw-0004yK-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIiav-0003AK-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:60214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIiar-00039B-Gh; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.61.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHX0m-1aJoWG09zY-003JCJ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:57:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:39:37 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:dwD/sbM2asSr71WNt3GAGplk2KglUD8YUYNwK4FvgCdYZgrb++u 6cwX3ls6Hj2+ZZeTTJq99cjTS4ruDgwBW4nHJI7RdfGGaDwJzicMAdXQy/7cgPreQ22c9Kd 0TZ6XVgA+w24JA540dWoGNyXXY2jV6pbRLsEf1OsKup+Kc8JJy7Uj/BsFhB0AFsR4J0q/OT 3jukdh9a0K5XEuwTIHx7A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zIqOCZH/lXo=:Vw8qensXamKqYGiGIEDdvU HPqhi+bN1HCqObPZfRPcVkXt6/CEgZHf0+LL3U2gm08tPTeyN5WBlA7XeGW0yXeB9EiTaltmO o+2tadSuZAgphZP8QLyL2zgO7k5Jur8YwwhWcPGratAbvJQo7GxvNcPzXyeG5tOZwOF29yV3/ RvPyCQfArpJ+11h8PPmljk81EIODghWysHlXuNuKqeC15M45zqfLnSnLvVqTKxOw9oPjts7JR 2+zrOlOQ9laBwm2l0PoUaHrkTYpXn17WfMwf9nYUC2O6fvJ6ilNfMWxD74Ohxk6y+M+fjnEov mhbjRFvkf1kI3PBvyRfGsd7+2LvskvBmZbVSrTE0zrh2x+l7yht7cxHAiC/vdeXcLYieSMh7m x7kewSpp0vQ5lpnXHjNuKeCWeyTuHKmEjy/8lDLRoPg2H7FzLKLoaKpyHTAreGpETxtLmMEIA 1QHlZ2LHrceXEX78cf7vprXLcz0ovoV6IVIHIsW0L0VB002xw1+YCWCvOmLN4vAr7JVNKkYz/ JLoKneUDT08si5auOLFxgm6yJCT8/Y10EguDH3sEh43yMJ9/iyGvBjSHgkUkJObHsoY7vVi3c Bj5q1RbLnz1Dm3BVc0rRSsMPeeP4yn01TelgR0nkRDhyX+7IDypvaWkiHX2Qlj1roELe6G7Ri W8POTWSue00g0q6j/LNHh0q2wBTfcQ+7baGQaOF5QNMxouGfD+jHx/Jk6CQKaza8yntuiMMtF zIAWy2hP696IW2ZrYxvNv/TpW8vJE+/GrehHgmo91C/mNLdYIBeWrcneRsx8sMW/S+a+5eL9 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198047 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: >>> When I read the severity levels, I actually wondered if we have more than >>> needed severity tags... How would one distinguish among critical, grave and >>> serious severities? > >> They are, and you can't. But these are debbugs levels, and I think it would >> be a waste of our resources to try fighting that. Instead, I suggest not to >> use those levels we think are superfluous. > > Critical/grave/serious: The distinction does not win any bug more attention, > or cause it to be fixed any quicker, so "serious" is all we should need. So does debbugs-gnu.el. Only "serious" is offered from these three. Best regards, Michael.