Hi Paul,

Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:

> Is there any reason for the specific value 226 in configure.ac's
> '[libsystemd >= 226]'? Won't this code work with libsystemd 222, say?
> That's the version in Fedora 23.

There is no specific reason other than 226 is what is installed on my
system and what I have tested against.  If you are able to test on an
earlier version, this number could be reduced.

> The code tests whether st_is_socket returns a nonnegative value, but
> shouldn't it be testing whether it returns a positive value?

Indeed, you're correct, I missed that one.  The attached patch should
take care of that.

Thanks,
-- 
Matt