From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: refcards out of date? Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:05:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87h97qs13v.fsf@petton.fr> References: <20161031153709.41c94de7@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <837f8nnl95.fsf@gnu.org> <83shramtst.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478077595 5477 195.159.176.226 (2 Nov 2016 09:06:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, perry@piermont.com To: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 10:06:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1rV1-0008UW-Fo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:06:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53503 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1rV4-0004ve-AE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1rUU-0004vZ-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1rUT-0006iR-C1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:05:50 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([2a00:5884:8368::1]:44396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1rUS-0006gE-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:05:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83shramtst.fsf@gnu.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1478077542; bh=cHIo2QVqoDdRplwkHdvxinKjAktavNMAkxEniFHXIQE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZOiUEd8mcw494g0oYwhIr9HtxeHDkqXsa8noE8knqK9N3/hKTmXjWlG0oecB3jf1VC/1Y5V4KAiqfRU+gSEpDu8f+aCulhDOWKSu0cJVUYCiNzyMXu5ZYdNL8+nJvOoVE9PHjG+6NAYSGJtz14l/Adwd9GJWvZGRRJgyJOo1tIg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:5884:8368::1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209104 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Can anyone see how come they were not updated this time? > > They are, in the tarball. E.g., refcard.pdf there says "version 25". > I think the problem is that no one replaced the refcards on the GNU > Web site. Indeed. I should have done that, I just forgot. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYGaxkAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQ6l4H/i9jLWEidxgDrUzHU48uyV7G PzuHMij5G81wga7RNn15P2ASE7zl/yvvW5X4oEBtsaxbr9lNdbaHmSJ8St9l+pPc m/k00AD2EQqVq4eG+UhkwATC9O5tJhkdVF0R5SHnQ3LEe+ZGiEygb1oWkfn8bnPo 1qsfycymelmf8z+3VkB4xO1322kX2btGMozZq3a3InLCJi54YO0yl9Pn7kUaPVXR 9JGS3vtEhMtPXrM+Iy/q6A/FbyV03xY1n7OBedE4J7cH9YIPfO/nC0IQPmvqZqYP 92Mmi3qFsp8FoA8yuo0ova0PTx9NzCMfEmRWCzeWwboqOJnmp9QE+84+rHuhUD8= =P7UP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--