Re: Continuous integration

[phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord)]

Oh, I was talking about CI, nothing else.

gitlab and that sort of tool doesn't force you to do diffing or merging
of source code in the web interface. The code review tools, I don't know
about. Some systems have pretty good email interfaces for discussing
diffs; I haven't used gitlabs one, so I don't know.

Phil

raman@google.com (T.V Raman) writes:

> As long as we dont end up doing things like diff/merge  of source code
> inside a browser window, I'll stay mostly happy.
>
> Phillip Lord writes:
>  > raman <raman@google.com> writes:
>  > 
>  > > Would be nice to target a tool that is usable from within Emacs  --
>  > > rather than dumbing things down to a What You See Is All You Have
>  > > browser environment. 
>  > 
>  > To an extent, although, probably not to the extent that it is usuable
>  > everywhere else. Nor to the extent that we have to develop something
>  > specific rather than using software that already exists.
>  > 
>  > > Is it safe to assume that people developing Emacs are using Emacs as an
>  > > editor?
>  > 
>  > As an editor, but not necessarily for everything else.
>  > 
>  > 
>  > > Browser-based tools get inflicted on one in a heterogeneous  environment
>  > > where different individuals use a variety of editors, platforms and
>  > > machine types --- in this instance --- emacs-Development --- it would be
>  > > nice to leverage the strenghts of Emacs if it is indeed a common
>  > > component of our varied environments.
>  > 
>  > Both of the tools that have been mentioned (gitlab and buildbot) have
>  > IRC interfaces, so that could be contacted this way. Another solution
>  > would be to extend them to serve up an org file, with hyperlinks through
>  > to logs, and so forth.
>  > 
>  > AFAICT, the current solution (hydra) doesn't offer an emacs front end.
>  > 
>  > Phil
>
> --