From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs master commit: "Add current-line in simple.el" - Wrong commit log? Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8yzt26o.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87wp88w3lo.fsf@petton.fr> <87d19tkfdh.fsf@cassou.me> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498738883 2742 195.159.176.226 (29 Jun 2017 12:21:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:21:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Damien Cassou , Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 29 14:21:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQYRe-0000UM-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:21:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQYRj-0001t2-SR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQYRd-0001sw-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQYRa-0007kJ-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:55084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQYRa-0007gC-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:21:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d19tkfdh.fsf@cassou.me> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1498738864; bh=JuPqItG4m5PPXKLIWJoyKoMfqCQVB54j5K0+KG+TaTA=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=w/+VHHRs/7wrT/QsyrsaKoq1lyEEvZFjTyEJEJiF6SmZ3aKJj1rCgAWMmkm3hY3f8eJoXVyt/gitA6qJdF1B3aSGJDXYVnLnhfbD42ci6VU4HR/ZNM/N5CzQ68mI6HX1sGXt/RRj5VzwvrzTk2Ur7uljviH/y9SaPMexUNa27eo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216045 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Damien Cassou writes: > Here is a new version. I took the opportunity to add a NEWS entry=20 > and to reflect the change in the elisp manual. Great, thanks! > -(defun line-number-at-pos (&optional pos) > - "Return (narrowed) buffer line number at position POS. > +(defun line-number-at-pos (&optional pos absolute-p) Why not simply `absolute' instead of `absolute-p'. It's not a predicate, is it? Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZVPCvAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQzUkH/isafA1FfJ4LO5O4Fjm33RS9 MPTUIfVN8oyW+WGHnFmdTCvpec9YblQz74OpPdQhm7yA/hQPHHUzQRlrOIpw3+CU 8mE7zgsfXMHnbM9I1LpYESfQl4eaeNaohv2yzH30RiyntnDN8MD0xaMMJGwZ1MKD 3pmeAy/r6NKE4ls3Sh1Z7Bo2MRm/COlVd+Iwowc4qtkP5CTmdueXgtHkIpYnAe2X 0JqecztcmfVuEHFY4lkEGwVxOO50hl9gjpClLSfsx5xbYKoo2avDraAi5W2Y1jSZ GDfbtIrOrNgrMuMa4QP3a5SjItRSXpyILfadNQ3z53j5hevrzF2xAfZATzcelzs= =fCJZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--