From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 16dc580 3/3: ; Update ChangeLog.3 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 15:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8vc1j9o.fsf@petton.fr> References: <20171005211848.8859.82655@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171005211850.82FB820487@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87fuawvczw.fsf@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507297623 27542 195.159.176.226 (6 Oct 2017 13:47:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:47:03 +0000 (UTC) To: Stephen Berman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 06 15:46:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0Sxt-0006Nd-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 15:46:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45017 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0Sy0-00086G-Tl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0SxX-0007p8-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0SxU-0002np-8A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:43468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0SxT-0002lC-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:46:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fuawvczw.fsf@gmx.net> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1507297588; bh=LXNrAMKingC9XflCiyIk5kuMbuC748819AKjF5STVKE=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=n0rKghCtgQ/fgRVZGYw1192NchrT06L6ClCQbKds2+Q2a6QJjj2p6KIugLapaHhaHC1wJUJVsmp1k5ObDhF4+5mhmzfbDAyTXVNNFz1JUrkns2GYPNcZpW8lcT8tRl1niBUsymd+1g2sIN5eS1+cK6Kj/G+nBvlinsSdUZb2uJA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219183 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Stephen Berman writes: > Should the ChangeLog files be amended where possible (unlike commit > messages, which IIUC can't be)? One case is the following with an > incorrect email address (due to an oversight on my part when > committing): I can amend it, no problem. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEKNO+2FH986tX/vk8IzWHpHwgeRAFAlnXiTMACgkQIzWHpHwg eRCAHAgApL8YCPw954g5/5Np7WgFGNWha5l5Y3CvrZajHVxhKyqH54URuOlbcMzN 920HD9RKmcXWIYGgBDeYBdtULsHk934U4sjVsRmfcJq8bAX50HxpFqPLH6BYR620 hRnehc5AxP4N+kfiqmNgp9JRlayCFAYkJBCerbG6WckvH1Wxihdd1Pbtt8TSEuGy BkuCMOOKCypOJL6TEX8Fngjzi6aidXM493l7gRgktgIgVIkQyrCkhVMih/akn8oq RRJDwujGkdXK6duGxSOErajUx97bo6pjDkKzt+1djlD9Rl3C4AAHQBmG3sN86hpF U0g34iFlms8EDkrcERalf+QU4dvMXg== =I4bT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--