From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Use of minibuffer-prompt face when minibuffer is not involved Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 15:22:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8a1yvls.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8736lmi2dg.fsf@gmail.com> <54cf21f3-86fa-4af4-9872-7493b44e2f6f@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="187090"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 11 15:58:45 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hPSWS-000mMz-O2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 15:58:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59144 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPSWK-0007hX-Qx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRxE-0006OD-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRxC-0004Le-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]:34694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRxA-0004Jw-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id f8so923682wrt.1 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 06:22:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=YoeJ9sM+ysqYxMmmg1wu2j/8QfVNuK+83bV7aBy7OH8=; b=KNgH9REBywgZWjyfl/03bUvDfmrvZ9LDVGXGVGcP5jgS64Amdpck4/RlQcrV1sVHXI OBYhvAkpl+eqOWwseC9ooIDvNzUyCqBhbfiLUZyouWYXuhu4Ue4JL/r3W0xnFy3fD9N4 h7E6Lelo8hw3YRk4Bw1hzPO3eTpdpYfpeDnJ+9L6mf/7L9/JnRZE0t9rtn18I7uUGwjk A0M0ePCp7MoPPCYDPRmkIrhcaefYjFxt5tQCsfpthBbtrzJZRyykEvwVO9Pxvs9iq22B bIQq0xysnFEErJGoqEXLTLkS3hhVQszLgWlSIetqZX6V46MD0xfWY0Loegtck0KMoHET 5ekg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=YoeJ9sM+ysqYxMmmg1wu2j/8QfVNuK+83bV7aBy7OH8=; b=Y7ULPPyYHkcWDfBb0c1iGcrV/hLzPJEY4QToaGTVxIVLmi6coPGpS2upOa5pz/wCZD CkCTSOSXxzpHgwuYs+WfrBnoIbhE8ZCXkObbRuzizeCNIMyhJs9DbS82nqilEtNBg74x rDhl5H2NKEJSco8y5ucVaM3qOXsnOc8DBElZA+Hd4Kc7m1IBi7sQf5C/BmZHrEMN2Pgh KW6lImLn8OkizyUV03fv1JTcsAftREUzmYk/1z3dVGQejbasH4oiLC5LsXSwuaOpqwwf 8T25ACpifurP8S9rKf1ixHvULqhPRrjMqCXGCQAvNtSJ96nDUKdO+XJpiTJqdVJma09k m0FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWtSgqlI3NFxod6lNFfLBqkWUI8OjmbgABb6kKUddfZvu8mdBaA q1CKROOonitDcFUc5WGjm9/3OS1T X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4dfNI4ZAtNsWi+OFifpSJIOToggfhNoQN6YyL1hGS2K4IZYjeRyLmaDPEAN9hJzcAqkPxFw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5544:: with SMTP id g4mr3907860wrw.327.1557580932610; Sat, 11 May 2019 06:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from nc10-laptop ([92.184.112.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v189sm13329197wma.3.2019.05.11.06.22.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 May 2019 06:22:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54cf21f3-86fa-4af4-9872-7493b44e2f6f@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 14:59:44 -0700 (PDT)") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::433 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 May 2019 09:58:27 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236422 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > This emacs-dev thread should _drop_ the question of > `dired-do-shell-command' and whether or how its > prompting should best be worded or highlighted or > whatever. > > It was a _mistake_ for the bug thread to ever have > confounded the two discussions - and even to confound > a third, also unrelated. discussion about allowing > text properties for `help-echo' tooltips. > > The question raised for emacs-devel by this thread > is whether non-minbuffer prompting should have a > face, and if so, which face. Right. Apologies for mentioning the bug thread on emacs-devel. I hoped that confining it too footnotes would ensure that it would not derail this thread (while avoiding the XY problem of not mentioning *why* I was looking at these prompts in the first place); obviously I misjudged.