From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cairo now default? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:47:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87h80fv87g.fsf@yandex.com> References: <87ftfzx509.fsf@yandex.com> <87blqnx1vi.fsf@yandex.com> <877e1bx0kl.fsf@yandex.com> <8736bzwx92.fsf@yandex.com> <87tv4fvdwc.fsf@yandex.com> <87lfprv99g.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="4450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 28 17:48:58 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwU2r-00016o-Kg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:48:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33508 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwU2q-0006sl-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwU1y-0005xK-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwU1v-0005uE-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from forward102o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.182]:39900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwU1u-0005qq-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mxback25o.mail.yandex.net (mxback25o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::76]) by forward102o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8E8356681B6A; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:47:49 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from iva2-18315b3f9ecc.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva2-18315b3f9ecc.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:1404:0:640:1831:5b3f]) by mxback25o.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id qeRpduhVNa-lnc4NrGX; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:47:49 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1580230069; bh=jBIP9avfHMWA7W/TfuYpAFNHaEPYiHiMHBZdMzzbebo=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Cc:Cc:Date:References:Message-ID; b=Sljtr6rUu+r71aiGr4zZwZrmH1vwNokp70NhVBqVNU5mh8uSPxa2j0iy+vJHs+ueb a7TGtbUThY3RIWvD17JqyPAWip3VNGLUTqcxyAVihUaRlPdZwuqfthpQ1KY5QY10po FFxOUZWIXMEQ1EQJjovQP5dPKkr655cp2RoCGwgU= Authentication-Results: mxback25o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Original-Received: by iva2-18315b3f9ecc.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 1vEmLHXy1T-lmWmRZfq; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:47:48 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Face: -P+89ASh_wrs;AUGm`!l[}/o-lyK}5W.gq\fkJ{#d6Gu,hWrZNz::iMm5PJb} __A96]-LUrl)X=uF=V|\3-\9/sXvBs/H In-Reply-To: (Robert Pluim's message of "Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:37:40 +0100") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAA8AAAAPCAYAAAA71pVKAAAABmJLR0QA/wD/AP+gvaeTAAAA aklEQVQokaXSMQoCQRAEwFoDH6Om3od8myDqgeCn/MIFZ5uJhjs7MMEEBU0zLSzY6p9bK+I3DsIS 0rkXqOA17Kr4+g3fidewr+L5t7VNZ8vnEXz6uwqFTSP4OYITjiP4AdXfDqYWXgUM9w9BRfavym8k WAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 37.140.190.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244716 Archived-At: >>>>> "Robert" =3D=3D Robert Pluim writes: Robert> To me they look slightly sharper. Tomayto, tomahto. I don=CA=BCt Robert> think either look bad. (I=CA=BCm assuming they're both using the Robert> same font). Robert> Robert But there is a difference - slight perhaps - and I think some users will notice and wonder why. Should they not be forewarned of the possibility, or do you think that might cause even more confusion? Best wishes,